Document Type : Original Articles
Authors
1 Department of Microbiology, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
2 Razi Herbal Medicines Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
1.Introduction
The human urinary tract is a suitable place for the growth of microorganisms such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Human papillomavirus (HPV), Mycoplasma genitalium, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Gardnerella vaginalis, Haemophilus ducreyi, Mycoplasma hominis, Treponema pallidum, Ureaplasma parvum, Candida albicans, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Trichomonas vaginalis parasite. These microorganisms include bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, which are called sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Globally, STIs are common among youth and adults. Organisms involved in STDs can cause infections in the human genitourinary tract, leading to infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), miscarriage, and inflammation of the cervix in women and epididymitis, urethritis, and prostatitis in men [1-3].
According to reports, C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, M. genitalium, T. vaginalis, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, U. parvum, HSV are the most common STD pathogens. Some STD pathogens are treated with appropriate antibiotic therapy. However, most STD pathogens have unusual symptoms and are difficult to diagnose. Therefore, rapid and low-cost development of in vitro STD diagnostic screening methods will help reduce STD-related genital damage and improve women’s health worldwide [4-6].
Annual reports of the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that approximately 340 million STIs occur worldwide, with the highest rates in developing countries. However, according to WHO reports, STIs are more common in developed countries. Global statistics show that the prevalence of these infectious agents varies according to economic status, age, individual and community health, the number of sexual partners, and the social conditions of the community. Therefore, STIs are generally considered a major global problem with devastating consequences, including financial loss and family damage [1, 7, 8]. This study aimed to design a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) molecular technique for the detection of sexually transmitted agents such as N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, HSV-2, and HPV.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Type of study and sample collection
In the present descriptive-cross-sectional study in 2022, sampling was done from patients who were referred to Qom, Iran for the presence of HSV-2, HPV, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and T. vaginalis. According to Cochran’s formula (Equation 1) to calculate the sample size, about 79 samples with a confidence level of 1.96 should be tested, and 100 samples were tested in this study with a 10% probability of error.

2.2. Design of a multiplex PCR molecular technique to detect N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, HSV-2, and HPV
According to the instructions, DNA was extracted from the samples using the CinnaPure purification kit (Cinaclon Co., Iran).
Primers were designed using CLC Sequence Viewer version 6 [9] and Gene Runner software [10] and the NCBI website [11] (Table 1).
First, the target sequence for each of these genes was downloaded from the NCBI database using the CLC Sequence Viewer version 6 software. These sequences were placed one below the other and primers were designed based on the completely conserved regions. Finally, with the help of Gene Runner software version 6.5.52 beta [10], the thermodynamic properties of the primers were checked to ensure that secondary structure (primer dimer, loops, and hairpin structures) were not formed. For the multiplex reaction to be carried out, an effort was made to align the reaction temperature for each of these agents so that detection could be performed in a single run.
To perform the PCR reaction, a final volume of 25 µL contained a mixture of 12.5 µL Mastermix (SinaClon Co., Iran), 1 µL of each primer, and 5 µL of DNA template. The program for the thermocycler was optimized under the following conditions: Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 sec, annealing at 51 °C for 30 sec, extension at 72 °C for 40 sec, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Finally, 5 µL of each PCR product was loaded into the wells of a 2% electrophoresis gel and placed in the electrophoresis tank for 50 min, and the results were observed with the gel doc.
3. Results
During this research, about 100 samples of patients referred for HSV, HPV, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and T. vaginalis tests were prepared for medical diagnosis laboratories after receiving consent. After extracting the sample, qualitative and quantitative control of extraction was performed. Then, based on the primers designed for each PCR target, and after the set-up, a multiplex PCR test was performed. Based on this, in the multiplex PCR technique, bands were observed as follows: T. vaginalis at 248 bp, C. trachomatis at 347 bp, HPV at 450 bp, N. gonorrhoeae at 592 bp, and HSV-2 at 697 bp (Figure 1).
3.1. Frequency of pathogenic agents in the samples
In this study, the frequency of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, HSV-2, and HPV in the available samples was 8%, 5%, 3%, 12%, and 18%, respectively (Figure 2).
The samples were checked simultaneously with the molecular diagnosis kit GA STD12 Plus RT-PCR KIT (GeneovA co., Iran), and the results were 100% consistent.
HPV and C. trachomatis were detected in five samples, and HPV and T. vaginalis were detected in two samples.
4. Discussion
In this research, about 100 Pap smear samples were used to detect HSV, HPV, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and T. vaginalis using the designed multiplex PCR technique. In this study, the frequency of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, HSV-2, and HPV was 8%, 5%, 3%, 12%, and 18%, respectively. The samples were checked simultaneously with the molecular diagnosis kit of GeneovA Company, and the positive cases were confirmed with the kit based on real-time PCR. Also, the results showed that HPV and C. trachomatis were detected together in five samples, and HPV and T. vaginalis infections were observed in two samples.
In the study by Faroughi and Amini (2021), which was conducted on 60 infertile patients with symptomatic vaginal infection who were referred to Kerman Hospital, the frequency of infection with N. gonorrhoeae and Toxoplasma gondii was 6.6% and 10%, respectively. Co-infection with N. gonorrhoeae and T. gondii was not detected in any of the samples [12]. The results of Amini et al study showed that the multiplex PCR method was suitable for the diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae and T. gondii in vaginal infections, which is consistent with the results obtained in the present study [12]. In the study of Kriesel et al. (2016), an STI panel including several sets of PCR primers for each organism was designed for the detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. pallidum, T. vaginalis, M. genitalium, U. urealyticum, H. ducreyi, and different types of herpes viruses. Among the samples, 13% C. trachomatis, 7% N. gonorrhoeae, 3% T. vaginalis, 2% HSV-2, 12% U. urealyticum, 3% M. genitalium, and 4% T. pallidum were detected. The concordance between the FilmArray STI panel and the standard nucleic acid amplification test was 98% for C. trachomatis and 97% for N. gonorrhoeae [13].
Beayni et al. (2021), performed a retrospective data analysis on all STD panels conducted at AUBMC from 2017-2019 to determine the molecular prevalence of eight different sexually transmitted organisms. Only 53.5% of the samples were positive for one or more organisms. U. urealyticum/parvum was the most common pathogen (49.3%), followed by G. vaginalis (33.5%), C. trachomatis (5.36%), M. genitalium (5.16%), N. gonorrhoeae (2.5%), HSV (2.5%), and T. vaginalis (1.39%). In terms of pathogen distribution between genders, U. urealyticum/parvum, HSV, and G. vaginalis were more common in women, and the rest were more common in men [14].
So, with the development of molecular techniques, STD screening with high sensitivity and specificity became easier. Yuan et al. (2023) created a TP-HSV1-HSV2 multiplex polymerase chain reaction by targeting the conserved regions of the PolA gene and the UL42 gene of HSV-1 and HSV-2 to detect the skin lesions of 115 patients suspected of TP and HSV-1/2 infection. Sensitivity and specificity in secretion samples for TP were 91.7% and 100%; for i, 100% and 98%; and for HSV-2 89.7% and 100%. This method seems to be effective in patients suspected of primary TP infection but negative for non-treponemal antibody testing, and it is useful for the differential diagnosis of new genital, perianal, and oral skin lesions in patients with a history of previous syphilis [15]. Along with the present research, in the study of Carneiro et al. (2020), despite the increase in the use of molecular diagnostic methods to diagnose STIs, cytological findings in Pap smears of patients with pathogens that can only be identified by PCR were evaluated. Cervical samples for conventional and liquid cytology and multiplex PCR were collected from women aged 23 to 54 who underwent routine screening in the gynecology department. Multiplex PCR was positive in 36.2% of samples. U. parvum (14.9%), C. trachomatis (10.6%), T. vaginalis (10.6%), M. hominis (8.5%), U. urealyticum (4.2%), M. genitalium (4.2%), and N. gonorrhoeae (2.2%) were detected. Multiple pathogens were observed in 12.8% of the samples [16].
In line with our study, Hernández-Rosas and his colleagues conducted a study in 2021 to investigate the prevalence of Candida spp., Ureaplasma spp., T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, HSV, and Mycoplasma. Their prospective, cross-sectional study included 377 women participating in the reproductive health campaign. Cervicovaginal samples were collected and analyzed with an in-house multiplex PCR to identify Candida spp., Ureaplasma, T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoeae, HSV, Mycoplasma spp., and C. trachomatis. The most common pathogen identified in this population was Ureaplasma spp. (29.4%), followed by Mycoplasma spp. (14.9%) and Candida spp. (12.5%). Also, 33.7% of positive cases were single infections and 12.7% were simultaneous infections. The multiplex PCR method was designed by targeting nucleotide sequences [17]. In 2020, Neena and her colleagues conducted a study to investigate C. trachomatis infection during pregnancy by the PCR method. Endocervical swabs were collected from 300 pregnant women. Among them, 29 samples were positive based on PCR. The results showed that the prevalence of C. trachomatis in their population was 10%. Hence, it should be considered an important public health problem, especially among sexually active young women of reproductive age. Timely diagnosis and quick treatment of C. trachomatis infection during pregnancy can eliminate its adverse consequences [18].
5. Conclusion
According to the results of this study, the multiplex method is a fast and cost-effective approach for diagnosis in a clinical laboratory. In this study, co-infections were detected in the least amount of time and at lowest cost, which is more cost-effective than single PCR, and the detection speed of co-infections was faster.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran (Code: IR.IAU.QOM.REC.1403.101).
Data availability
Data from the present study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.
Authors' contributions
Conceptualization and supervision: Mohammad Reza Zolfaghari; Statistical analysis: Abbas Morovvati; Methodology and experiments: Marziyeh Bastamifard and Seyed Soheil Aghaei; Writing: Pegah Shakib.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Research Laboratory of the Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran, for their cooperation.
References
References