Association of rs5743899 Polymorphism of the TOLLIP Gene With Susceptibility to Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Southwest Iran

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran. & Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

2 Student Research Committee, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran

3 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran. & Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

10.32598/ARI.81.2.3756

Abstract

Introduction: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) represents a vector-borne infection resulting from various species of Leishmania. Host genetic factors, such as polymorphisms in immune-related genes, influence susceptibility to CL. The TOLLIP gene, a regulator of innate immunity, has been linked to various infectious diseases. This study investigates the association of the rs5743899 polymorphism in the TOLLIP gene with susceptibility to CL in a cohort from Khuzestan Province, Iran, where Leishmania major is endemic.
Materials & Methods: The study included 67 clinically confirmed patients with CL who presented with active lesions, along with 101 healthy controls. Whole blood was obtained from the subjects, genomic DNA was extracted, and genotyping of the rs5743899 polymorphism was performed using the amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR method. Data were analyzed using SPSS software to determine genotype frequencies and associations with CL.
Results: The genotypic frequencies were consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both the case and control groups. The P-values obtained for the rs5743899 polymorphism were greater than 0.05, suggesting no association with susceptibility to CL (P=0.189 for allele frequency and P=0.132 for genotype frequency). Furthermore, the odds ratio analysis demonstrated that the presence of TT, CT, and CC genotypes did not increase the risk of developing CL.
Conclusion: Although this study provides preliminary evidence regarding the lack of association between rs5743899 and CL in the studied population, the relatively small sample size may have limited the detection of modest genetic effects. Therefore, larger multicenter studies are recommended to validate these results. While these findings clarify aspects of the disease’s genetic background, they also point to the need for further research into other genetic and environmental contributors to its epidemiology.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Introduction
Leishmaniasis is considered a tropical zoonotic disease caused by infection with protozoan parasites of the Leishmania genus, transmitted through insect vectors. It manifests in visceral, cutaneous, and mucocutaneous forms, with symptoms ranging from mild, self-limiting skin ulcers to severe, life-threatening conditions [1]. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is particularly prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions, affecting approximately 12 million people across 100 countries, with around 350 million individuals at risk [1]. The majority of CL cases (more than 90%) are reported from nations such as Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Syria, Iran, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Nicaragua [2]. The etiological agents of CL vary by region: L. major, L. tropica, and L. aethiopica predominate in the Old World, while L. braziliensis, L. amazonensis, and L. mexicana are more frequent in the New World [1]. 
Immune system-related factors play a significant role in susceptibility to leishmaniasis. Additionally, various studies have indicated the involvement of genetic factors in the predisposition to different forms of Leishmaniasis. Several investigations have demonstrated the role of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in immune response against protozoan parasites [3]. TLRs function as key regulators in host immunity against Leishmania infection [4]. Recent studies underscore the important role of TLR4 in inhibiting Leishmania proliferation within both innate and adaptive immunity [5]. Genes in the TLR pathway may significantly influence predisposition to leishmaniasis. Toll-interacting protein (TOLLIP) serves as a negative regulator in TLR signaling, especially in suppressing TLR4 and TLR2 pathways [6]. Additionally, Toll-interacting protein is proposed to modulate human TLR signaling by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), whereas it promotes IL-10 as an anti-inflammatory cytokine [7]. 
A number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported in genes encoding cytokines that play pivotal roles in immune system regulation. Most SNPs are found in the UTRs of cytokine genes; some can enhance cytokine expression, whereas others may have minimal or no impact [8]. Considering that the Th1 (T helper 1) response leads to parasite killing and that the TLR pathway is important for inhibiting parasite proliferation in animal models, these pathways may have a potential role in host defense. Since TOLLIP acts as a key negative regulator of TLR-mediated signaling and can modulate cytokine production, genetic variations in this gene may influence the magnitude of host immune responses. Given the possible association between the TOLLIP gene and susceptibility to CL, and considering the limited studies on this disease, we focused on the rs5743899 polymorphism located in an intronic region of the TOLLIP gene (NM_019009). Studies on this SNP are scarce, particularly in Iranian populations, and previous research has suggested its potential involvement in susceptibility to infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [7, 9], highlighting its possible functional relevance in immune response pathways. These findings suggest that TOLLIP variants, including rs5743899, might contribute to differences in susceptibility to Leishmania infection through modulation of TLR and cytokine signaling pathways. Therefore, in this study, we investigated its potential association with susceptibility to CL caused by L. major and L. tropica, with L. major being the predominant species responsible for CL in southwestern Iran, particularly in Khuzestan Province. 

2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects

The present study was conducted in Khuzestan Province, southwest of Iran, where CL caused by L. major is endemic. A total of 67 patients with active CL lesions, confirmed by clinical and parasitological diagnosis [45 males (67%), 22 females (33%)], and 101 unrelated healthy controls [63 males (62.4%), 38 females (37.6%)] without active lesions and without a history of CL were enrolled in the present study. The patients consisted of CL individuals referred to the leishmaniasis reference laboratory. The diagnosis was confirmed through microscopic identification of amastigotes in lesion exudates, which were smeared, methanol-fixed, and Giemsa-stained for examination under light microscopy. Parasitic density was assessed based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, ranging from 4+ (1–10 parasites per field) to 1+ (1–10 parasites per 1000 fields). 
Equally important, the control group comprised healthy volunteers, providing a crucial basis for comparison. In this study, the age distribution was determined to sample the age group of 15-50 years. Non-Iranian and non-native individuals were excluded from the study. All participants provided informed consent before blood sample collection, after the Ethical Committee of the Dezful University of Medical Sciences approved the protocol.

2.2. DNA extraction and genotyping
Patients and controls underwent venipuncture to obtain 2 mL of whole blood in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes. Genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes using a standard salting-out protocol, and the DNA quality and quantity were evaluated using a UV spectrophotometer at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm. DNA samples were then preserved at −20 °C for later use.
The TOLLIP gene rs5743899 polymorphism was genotyped by the amplification-refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) method. Primers for DNA amplification and fragment analysis were designed and validated using the SNP database and the BLAST website. Table 1 presents the primers designed for the genotyping of the rs5743899 polymorphism.

 


The ARMS-PCR for each sample was performed in two separate PCR reactions using different primer sets of inner and outer primers. FORW IC and FORW IT primers, along with REV OR, were used to generate products that detect the C and T alleles, respectively. The product of REV OR and FORW OF primers, meticulously designed to serve as an internal control, ensures the reliability of the results.  
PCR amplification was set up in 15-μL reaction mixtures comprising 7.5 μL of 2X PCR mastermix (Ampliqon, Denmark), 0.25 pmol/μL of each primer (metabion, Germany), and 1 μL of template DNA. PCRs were carried out using a Veriti™ Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems-US). The PCR steps were as follows: initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of amplification (denaturation: 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing: 61 °C for 45 seconds), followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes. The PCR products were visualized by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3. Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 16. The mean age and gender distribution were compared between the case and control groups using an independent t-test and a chi-square test. Genotypic frequencies were evaluated using the χ² test, considering P<0.05 as indicative of significance. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was analyzed by the chi-square test. The sample size was determined to achieve approximately 80% statistical power at α=0.05 to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0. Multiple genotype comparisons were adjusted statistically between groups to identify alleles or genotypes associated with an elevated risk of developing CL. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals.

3. Results
The analysis showed no significant difference in the mean age between the case (40.93±10 years) and control (38.59±12 years) groups (P=0.20). Additionally, no significant difference in gender distribution (P=0.623) between the CL patients and controls was noted, suggesting that the matching based on these two variables was adequate.
The rs5743899 polymorphism was genotyped by ARMS-PCR. Figure 1 illustrates PCR products separated on a 1.5% agarose gel.

 

The length of PCR products detecting the C and T alleles was 245 bp, while the length of the fragment used as an internal control was 481 bp.
The genotypic frequencies in the control and case groups were examined for HWE using the chi-square test. Both the control and case groups were consistent with HWE (P=0.919 for controls and P=0.06 for patients). Allelic and genotypic frequencies showed no significant difference. Table 2 presents the TOLLIP gene rs5743899 polymorphism genotype and allele frequencies in the case and control groups.

 

According to the Pearson chi-square test and the allele and genotype frequency table (Table 2), the P-value obtained for the rs5743899 polymorphism was greater than 0.05 (P=0.189 for allele frequency and P=0.132 for genotype frequency). Therefore, no significant association was observed between this polymorphism and susceptibility to CL. Additionally, logistic regression analysis of the rs5743899 polymorphism further confirmed that none of the genotypes (TT, CT, or CC) were significantly associated with an elevated risk of developing CL. Various genetic models, including allelic, codominant, dominant, recessive, and over-dominant, were evaluated. The calculated ORs showed no statistical significance in all comparisons, as evidenced by P>0.05 (Table 3).

 



4. Discussion 
Leishmaniasis, particularly CL, is an important public health challenge, especially in endemic regions like tropical and subtropical countries, including developing areas like Khuzestan Province in Iran. Depending on the pathogenicity of the parasite and the efficiency of the host’s immune system, it can lead to a range of clinical symptoms, from mild skin ulcers to life-threatening forms [2, 10]. The contribution of genetic factors to susceptibility to infectious diseases, including leishmaniasis, has been increasingly recognized. The TOLLIP gene, as a negative regulator of TLR signaling, plays an essential role in modulating the immune response to various pathogens, including Leishmania [4]. TLR4 inhibits the growth of L. major by inducing nitric oxide synthase in both innate and adaptive immunity [11]. Additionally, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipophosphoglycan (LPG) acts as a virulence determinant and is one of the principal molecules of the parasite. LPG induces macrophages to secrete TNF-α and IL-12 via MyD88 and relies on TLR2 to initiate NF-κB activation [12]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the downregulation of TLR3, TLR2, and MyD88 through RNA interference (RNAi) results in decreased secretion of nitric oxide and TNF-α triggered by Leishmania donovani promastigotes [13]. 
Several previous studies have indicated that the TOLLIP gene is linked to infectious diseases, including tuberculosis [14], HIV [9], leprosy [15], and both cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis (VL) [16, 17]. Given these studies, the genetic background of individuals regarding susceptibility to infectious diseases is evident, although study results may vary based on the population and the specific polymorphism examined. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the link between the rs5743899 polymorphism in the TOLLIP gene and susceptibility to CL in a population from Iran. In the current study, logistic regression analysis using various genetic models—including allelic, codominant, dominant, recessive, and over-dominant—revealed no statistically significant association between the rs5743899 polymorphism and predisposition to CL. Specifically, the allelic comparison (T vs C) yielded an OR of 1.43, with a 95% CI (0.83%, 2.46%) and a P-value of 0.19, indicating no significant increased risk. The codominant model (CT vs TT) and the over-dominant model (CT vs TT + CC) also showed non-significant associations (ORs of 1.12 and 0.98, respectively). For the recessive model (TT vs CC + CT), the OR was 1.29 (95% CI, 0.68%, 2.41%, P=0.42). Analysis under the dominant model (CC vs TT + CT) was not determined (ND) due to the extremely low frequency of the CC genotype in our study population, which precluded meaningful statistical comparison. Our findings suggest that rs5743899 does not play a substantial role in CL susceptibility in the studied population.
Interestingly, while our study did not find a significant association, other research has reported varying results regarding the role of TOLLIP polymorphisms in leishmaniasis susceptibility. For instance, a study conducted in Brazil suggested that different polymorphisms within the TOLLIP gene may affect the risk of developing CL, highlighting the potential for population-specific genetic factors to affect disease susceptibility [16]. Other research has reported similar results regarding these genetic factors. For instance, a 2020 case-control study in India examined polymorphisms in the TOLLIP gene, specifically rs3550920 and rs5743899, and found no association with the rs3550920 polymorphism; however, rs5743899 was suggested as a potential risk factor for VL [17]. These discrepancies may stem from differences in environmental factors, parasite species, or genetic backgrounds between populations. 
Additionally, the lack of significant findings in our study might reflect the complex interplay of multiple genetic and environmental factors contributing to leishmaniasis susceptibility. For instance, other polymorphisms in cytokine genes or TLRs may have a more pronounced influence on the immune response to Leishmania infection. For example, a 2021 study in India reported that the TLR9 T-1237C polymorphism increased susceptibility to visceral leishmaniasis [18], while another study in Iran found higher TLR2 and TLR4 expression in macrophages from patients with healed L. major lesions compared with non-healing cases, suggesting that both TLR2 and TLR4 may be important in the outcomes of CL caused by L. major [19]. In another study conducted in Turkey in 2021, researchers examined the association between cytokine gene polymorphisms and predisposition to CL. They focused on the polymorphisms IL-10-1082 G/A, TNF-α-308 G/A, IL-4 -590 C/T, IFN-γ+874 T/A, and IL-12B+1188 A/C. The results revealed that IL-4-590 C/T and TNF-α-308 G/A were correlated with an increased risk of developing CL [8]. The absence of association in our data may also be due to methodological constraints, including the low frequency of the CC genotype and a relatively limited sample size, both of which reduced statistical power to detect modest genetic effects. Furthermore, given that L. major is the predominant species in Khuzestan, regional differences in host–parasite interactions and environmental exposure might also contribute to the observed variability. Therefore, the findings of the present study should be interpreted with caution and considered preliminary. Further studies with larger cohorts and functional analyses are warranted to clarify the potential role of the TOLLIP rs5743899 polymorphism in CL susceptibility. Exploring interactions with environmental influences is also essential to gain a deeper understanding of the multifactorial nature of leishmaniasis susceptibility. 

5. Conclusion
In conclusion, our study did not find significant associations between the rs5743899 polymorphism of the TOLLIP gene and CL in the Khuzestan population. Nevertheless, these findings highlight the importance of investigating genetic factors in leishmaniasis and should be interpreted as preliminary due to the study’s limited sample size. Further research with larger cohorts and additional genetic markers is warranted to better understand the immune mechanisms underlying susceptibility to leishmaniasis and to inform targeted prevention and treatment strategies in endemic regions.

Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the financial support of Vice Chancellor of Research of Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

Compliance with ethical guidelines
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran (Code: IR.DUMS.REC.1401.062).

Funding

This study was extracted from the general medical doctorate thesis of Fatemeh Zohourmesgar, approved by the Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran. 
This study was supported by the Vice Chancellor of Research of Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran (Grant No.: MED-401041-1401).

Authors' contributions
Study design and supervision: Amir Mashayekhi and Ezatollah Ghasemi; Data collection: Amir Mashayekhi; Analysis and data interpretation: Amir Mashayekhi and Ezatollah Ghasemi; Writing: Amir Mashayekhi; Final approval: All authors.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

  1. de Vries HJC, Schallig HD. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: A 2022 updated narrative review into diagnosis and management developments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022; 23(6):823-40.[DOI:10.1007/s40257-022-00726-8] [PMID]
  2. Fatholahizadeh A, Mashayekhi A, Nayeri T, Ghasemi E. Molecular identification and characterization of the causative species of cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Dezful City, southwest Iran. Open Microbiol J. 2025; 19(1). [DOI:10.2174/0118742858367382250131080915]
  3. Kaushik D, Granato JT, Macedo GC, Dib PRB, Piplani S, Fung J, et al. Toll-like receptor-7/8 agonist kill Leishmania amazonensis by acting as pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory agent. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2021; 73(9):1180-90. [DOI:10.1093/jpp/rgab063][PMID]
  4. Srivastava A, Singh N, Mishra M, Kumar V, Gour JK, Bajpai S, et al. Identification of TLR inducing Th1-responsive Leishmania donovani amastigote-specific antigens. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012; 359(1-2):359-68. [DOI:10.1007/s11010-011-1029-5][PMID]
  5. Carneiro PP, Dórea AS, Oliveira WN, Guimarães LH, Brodskyn C, Carvalho EM, et al. Blockade of TLR2 and TLR4 attenuates inflammatory response and parasite load in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:706510. [DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2021.706510][PMID]
  6. Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA. Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005; 5(6):446-58. [DOI:10.1038/nri1630][PMID]
  7. Shah JA, Vary JC, Chau TT, Bang ND, Yen NT, Farrar JJ, et al. Human TOLLIP regulates TLR2 and TLR4 signaling and its polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2012; 189(4):1737-46. [DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1103541][PMID]
  8. Kirik FE, Ülger M, Tezcan Ülger S, Aslan G. Association of cytokine gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to cutaneous leishmaniasis in a Turkish population. Parasite Immunol. 2020; 42(11):e12775. [DOI:10.1111/pim.12775][PMID]
  9. Wang MG, Wang J, He JQ. Genetic association of TOLLIP gene polymorphisms and HIV infection: A case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):590. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06303-4][PMID]
  10. Sabzevari S, Teshnizi SH, Shokri A, Bahrami F, Kouhestani F. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. 2021; 152:104721. [DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2104721][PMID]
  11. Kropf P, Freudenberg MA, Modolell M, Price HP, Herath S, Antoniazi S, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to efficient control of infection with the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Infect Immun. 2004; 72(4):1920-8. [DOI:10.1128/72.4.1920-1928.2004][PMID]
  12. de Veer MJ, Curtis JM, Baldwin TM, DiDonato JA, Sexton A, McConville MJ, et al. MyD88 is essential for clearance of Leishmania major: possible role for lipophosphoglycan and Toll‐like receptor 2 signaling. Eur J Immunol. 2003; 33(10):2822-31. [DOI:10.1002/eji.200324128][PMID]
  13. Flandin JF, Chano F, Descoteaux A. RNA interference reveals a role for TLR2 and TLR3 in the recognition of Leishmania donovani promastigotes by interferon-γ‐primed macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2006; 36(2):411-20. [DOI:10.1002/eji.200535079][PMID]
  14. Wu S, Liu X, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang M, Wang M, et al. Polymorphisms of TLR2, TLR4 and TOLLIP and tuberculosis in two independent studies. Biosci Rep. 2020; 40(8):BSR20193141. [DOI:10.1042/BSR20193141][PMID]
  15. Shah JA, Berrington WR, Vary JC Jr, Wells RD, Peterson GJ, Kunwar CB, et al. Genetic variation in toll-interacting protein is associated with leprosy susceptibility and cutaneous expression of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist. J Infect Dis. 2016; 213(7):1189-97. [DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiv570][PMID]
  16. de Araujo FJ, da Silva LD, Mesquita TG, Pinheiro SK, Vital Wde S, Chrusciak-Talhari A, etal. Polymorphisms in the TOLLIP gene influence susceptibility to cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania guyanensis in the Amazonas State of Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9(6):e0003875. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003875][PMID]
  17. Sarmah P, Bharali R, Khatonier R, Khan A. Polymorphism in Toll interacting protein (TOLLIP) gene and its association with visceral Leishmanias Gene Rep. 2020; 20:100705. [DOI:10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100705]
  18. Mandal A, Kumar M, Kumar A, Sen A, Das P, Das S. TLR4 and TLR9 polymorphism: Probable role in susceptibility among the population of Bihar for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Innate Immun. 2021; 27(6):493-500. [DOI:10.1177/1753425920965658][PMID]
  19. Tolouei S, Hejazi SH, Ghaedi K, Khamesipour A, Hasheminia SJ. TLR2 and TLR4 in cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. Scand J Immunol. 2013; 78(5):478-84. [DOI:10.1111/sji.12105][PMID]
  1. References

    1. de Vries HJC, Schallig HD. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: A 2022 updated narrative review into diagnosis and management developments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022; 23(6):823-40.[DOI:10.1007/s40257-022-00726-8] [PMID]
    2. Fatholahizadeh A, Mashayekhi A, Nayeri T, Ghasemi E. Molecular identification and characterization of the causative species of cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Dezful City, southwest Iran. Open Microbiol J. 2025; 19(1). [DOI:10.2174/0118742858367382250131080915]
    3. Kaushik D, Granato JT, Macedo GC, Dib PRB, Piplani S, Fung J, et al. Toll-like receptor-7/8 agonist kill Leishmania amazonensis by acting as pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory agent. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2021; 73(9):1180-90. [DOI:10.1093/jpp/rgab063][PMID]
    4. Srivastava A, Singh N, Mishra M, Kumar V, Gour JK, Bajpai S, et al. Identification of TLR inducing Th1-responsive Leishmania donovani amastigote-specific antigens. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012; 359(1-2):359-68. [DOI:10.1007/s11010-011-1029-5][PMID]
    5. Carneiro PP, Dórea AS, Oliveira WN, Guimarães LH, Brodskyn C, Carvalho EM, et al. Blockade of TLR2 and TLR4 attenuates inflammatory response and parasite load in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:706510. [DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2021.706510][PMID]
    6. Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA. Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005; 5(6):446-58. [DOI:10.1038/nri1630][PMID]
    7. Shah JA, Vary JC, Chau TT, Bang ND, Yen NT, Farrar JJ, et al. Human TOLLIP regulates TLR2 and TLR4 signaling and its polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2012; 189(4):1737-46. [DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1103541][PMID]
    8. Kirik FE, Ülger M, Tezcan Ülger S, Aslan G. Association of cytokine gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to cutaneous leishmaniasis in a Turkish population. Parasite Immunol. 2020; 42(11):e12775. [DOI:10.1111/pim.12775][PMID]
    9. Wang MG, Wang J, He JQ. Genetic association of TOLLIP gene polymorphisms and HIV infection: A case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):590. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06303-4][PMID]
    10. Sabzevari S, Teshnizi SH, Shokri A, Bahrami F, Kouhestani F. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. 2021; 152:104721. [DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2104721][PMID]
    11. Kropf P, Freudenberg MA, Modolell M, Price HP, Herath S, Antoniazi S, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to efficient control of infection with the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Infect Immun. 2004; 72(4):1920-8. [DOI:10.1128/72.4.1920-1928.2004][PMID]
    12. de Veer MJ, Curtis JM, Baldwin TM, DiDonato JA, Sexton A, McConville MJ, et al. MyD88 is essential for clearance of Leishmania major: possible role for lipophosphoglycan and Toll‐like receptor 2 signaling. Eur J Immunol. 2003; 33(10):2822-31. [DOI:10.1002/eji.200324128][PMID]
    13. Flandin JF, Chano F, Descoteaux A. RNA interference reveals a role for TLR2 and TLR3 in the recognition of Leishmania donovani promastigotes by interferon-γ‐primed macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2006; 36(2):411-20. [DOI:10.1002/eji.200535079][PMID]
    14. Wu S, Liu X, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang M, Wang M, et al. Polymorphisms of TLR2, TLR4 and TOLLIP and tuberculosis in two independent studies. Biosci Rep. 2020; 40(8):BSR20193141. [DOI:10.1042/BSR20193141][PMID]
    15. Shah JA, Berrington WR, Vary JC Jr, Wells RD, Peterson GJ, Kunwar CB, et al. Genetic variation in toll-interacting protein is associated with leprosy susceptibility and cutaneous expression of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist. J Infect Dis. 2016; 213(7):1189-97. [DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiv570][PMID]
    16. de Araujo FJ, da Silva LD, Mesquita TG, Pinheiro SK, Vital Wde S, Chrusciak-Talhari A, etal. Polymorphisms in the TOLLIP gene influence susceptibility to cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania guyanensis in the Amazonas State of Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9(6):e0003875. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003875][PMID]
    17. Sarmah P, Bharali R, Khatonier R, Khan A. Polymorphism in Toll interacting protein (TOLLIP) gene and its association with visceral Leishmanias Gene Rep. 2020; 20:100705. [DOI:10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100705]
    18. Mandal A, Kumar M, Kumar A, Sen A, Das P, Das S. TLR4 and TLR9 polymorphism: Probable role in susceptibility among the population of Bihar for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Innate Immun. 2021; 27(6):493-500. [DOI:10.1177/1753425920965658][PMID]
    19. Tolouei S, Hejazi SH, Ghaedi K, Khamesipour A, Hasheminia SJ. TLR2 and TLR4 in cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. Scand J Immunol. 2013; 78(5):478-84. [DOI:10.1111/sji.12105][PMID]