1. Introduction
Camels play a crucial role in maintaining the economy in pastoral communities in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly in Africa and Asia ( 1 ). They are important sources of food (meat and milk) and a means of transport for the nomadic populations ( 2 ). These animals withstand and adapt to harsh environments, making them indispensable in these areas ( 3 ). Camel milk holds significant importance as a staple food for the population in arid regions and may be the sole available milk source in areas where maintaining other milking animals is challenging ( 4 ). Camel milk is considered a rich source of proteins and fat, essential minerals like calcium, and vitamins —especially vitamin A and C —as well as lactoferrin. It does not contain β-lactoglobulin (BLG), unlike cow milk ( 3 ). Recognized as the "desert white gold," camel milk has been renowned for its noteworthy nutritional and medicinal attributes ( 3 ).
Its consumption is promoted due to its enhanced digestibility, lower allergenicity, and, above all, its antioxidant, immunomodulating, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, and anti-apoptotic properties ( 4 ). Apart from its dietary and nutritional significance, camel milk possesses a valuable antibacterial property compared to other animals’ milk ( 4 ). World camel milk production was estimated at 4.11 million tons in 2022. However, the actual estimate of this production may be as high as 5.4 million tons due to undeclared traditional breeding ( 5 ). Raw camel milk is consumed without any processing, which exposes consumers to the risk of zoonotic infections such as brucellosis and tuberculosis, as well as severe infections such as Streptococcus agalactiae infection ( 6 ). Foodborne pathogens currently pose a significant global concern, causing disease outbreaks associated with the consumption of contaminated food, frequently due to bacterial toxins ( 7 ). Staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus aureus, are among the predominant bacteria involved in foodborne illnesses and are commonly isolated from milk in dairy herds ( 7 ). Routine mastitis diagnosis categorizes staphylococci into coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS). CNS, which comprise over 15 species, are considered opportunistic pathogens that cause mastitis ( 8 ).
Although the transmission mode of S. aureus is primarily direct, the epidemiology of CNS mastitis remains unclear ( 8 ). Furthermore, various CNS species have been isolated from extramammary sites such as skin and teats, emphasizing the importance of considering these facts when promoting prudent antimicrobial use ( 8 ). These bacteria can be recovered from milk samples of dairy animals without a noticeable increase in somatic cell count (SCC) ( 8 ). Among the CNS species, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus are significant types commonly found in human infections ( 9 ).
The growing emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious public health concern, particularly in relation to human staphylococcal infections. The main purposes of this study were, first, to differentiate Staphylococcus isolates from collected milk samples using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Biotyper (MALDI-TOF Biotyper). This technology has proven to be a rapid, accurate, and high-throughput method for identifying bacterial species. The second objective was to assess the antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus isolates.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling
Between December 2020 and February 2021, we collected 20 camel milk samples from various farms in M'sila, located 200 km south of Algiers within a steppe zone. The selection criteria for the farms included the absence of animals exhibiting clinical mastitis or udder inflammation, no use of antibiotics, and no organoleptic changes in the initial streams of foremilk. To avoid contamination, we collected raw milk samples in properly labeled screw-top bottles and transported them in a cold environment using an icebox to the laboratory.
2.2. Bacterial isolation
Staphylococci were isolated from raw camel milk using the spread plate technique, in accordance with the EN ISO 6888-1 standard procedure ( 10 ). The milk samples were streaked onto Baird-Parker agar medium supplemented with egg yolk potassium tellurite emulsion. The agar plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours to allow bacterial colonies to grow.
2.3. Bacterial identification
2.3.1. Purification and identification of Staphylococcus isolates
Presumptive staphylococcal colonies on Baird-Parker agar were confirmed using conventional methods, including assessment of colony morphology and catalase testing.
2.3.2. Identification of Staphylococcal species by MALDI-TOF Biotyper
We identified staphylococcal species using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Biotyper. In triplicate, we prepared pure colonies by spotting them onto polished steel target plates. Then, we applied 1 µL of formic acid (Bruker) and 1 µL of matrix solution (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, Bruker) to each dried spot. The prepared plate was subsequently analyzed using the Bruker MALDI-TOF Biotyper system.
2.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates, following the guidelines recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2020) ( 11 ). The inoculum turbidity was adjusted to match the 0.5 McFarland standard. Various antibiotics from different classes were tested, including β-lactams (Oxacillin [1μg], Penicillin [10 μg]), tetracyclines (Oxytetracycline [30 μg]), aminoglycosides (Gentamicin [30 μg], Tobramycin [10 μg]), fluoroquinolones (Ciprofloxacin [5 μg]), macrolides (Erythromycin [15 μg]), sulfonamides (Sulfonamide [200 μg]), phosphonic acid derivatives (Fosfomycin [50 μg]), and chloramphenicol (Chloramphenicol [30 μg]).
For isolates identified as S. epidermidis, a phenotypic characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) strains was performed using the disk diffusion test with 1 μg of oxacillin. Isolates demonstrating resistance to three or more different antimicrobial classes were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates.
3. Results
3.1. Milk contamination and recovery of staphylococci isolates
Our study analyzed 20 camel milk samples, all of which tested positive for Staphylococcus spp., indicating a 100% prevalence of Staphylococcus contamination (Table 1). While Enterococcus species were also present in the camel milk samples, our focus was solely on identifying Staphylococcus species. From these samples, we successfully retrieved a total of 30 Staphylococcus isolates. Among them, eight (27%) were coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS), while 22 (73%) were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS).
| Species | Coagulase test reaction | Number | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus | CPS | 5 | 17 |
| S. epidemidis | CNS | 11 | 37 |
| S. delphini | CPS | 3 | 10 |
| S. warneri | CNS | 4 | 13 |
| S. simulans | CNS | 4 | 13 |
| S. pasteuri | CNS | 3 | 10 |
| Total | - | 30 | 100 |
The most frequently isolated species from raw camel milk were S. epidermidis, accounting for 11 out of 30 isolates (37%), followed by S. aureus with five isolates (17%). Other coagulase-negative staphylococcal species included S. warneri (13%), S. simulans (13%), and S. pasteuri (10%). The CPS S. delphini was also identified in three out of 30 samples (10%).
3.2. Antibiotic susceptibility test
Our investigation included 30 Staphylococcus isolates to assess their susceptibility to various antibiotics. The results showed that only two isolates (6.66%) were sensitive to all tested antibiotics, while the vast majority (93.3%) exhibited resistance or intermediate susceptibility to at least one antibiotic. Notably, 50% of the isolates showed intermediate resistance to erythromycin, and 23% to ciprofloxacin.
Further details on antibiotic sensitivity and resistance are presented in Table 2, which displays the results of the antibiotic susceptibility testing for Staphylococcus spp. isolates. The table outlines the distribution percentages for sensitivity, intermediate resistance, and full resistance to different antibiotics.
| Antibiotic | Sensitive (%) | Intermediate (%) | Resistant (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tetracycline | 94 | 3 | 3 |
| Gentamicin | 97 | 0 | 3 |
| Erythromycin | 43 | 50 | 7 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 67 | 23 | 10 |
| Penicillin | 13 | 0 | 87 |
| Fosfomycin | 60 | 0 | 40 |
| Sulfonamide | 77 | 6 | 17 |
| Chloramphenicol | 94 | 3 | 3 |
| Tobramycin | 97 | 0 | 3 |
| Oxacillin* | 97 | 0 | 3 |
| *: only for S epidermidis | |||
3.3. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles
Among the isolates, a diverse range of resistance profiles emerged (Figure 1). Notably, resistance to penicillin as a single antibiotic was prevalent, with a significant 26.66% (8/30) of isolates exhibiting this resistance, while 30% (9/30) of isolates were multidrug-resistant. Resistance profiles involving two antibiotics, consistently featuring penicillin, showed varying prevalence rates, ranging from 3% to 13%. Specifically, the penicillin-fosfomycin resistance profile had a prevalence of 13%.
Figure 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of different Staphylococcus species.
Additionally, resistance profiles including penicillin-ciprofloxacin and penicillin-erythromycin were observed at a prevalence of 3% and 7%, respectively. Profiles involving resistance to three antibiotics collectively accounted for a prevalence of 19%, with the penicillin-ciprofloxacin-sulfonamide profile accounting for 10%. Finally, profiles characterized by resistance to four antibiotics represented a prevalence of 3%. This comprehensive analysis of antibiotic resistance profiles across various antibiotic combinations enhances our understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms.
4. Discussion
Our investigation into camel milk samples yielded compelling results concerning Staphylococcus contamination, especially when compared to previous studies.
While Staphylococcus is a common constituent of skin flora in both humans and animals, our study's standout finding was the 100% prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. contamination detected in the samples. Several previous studies on bacterial contamination of camel milk have reported varying prevalence of Staphylococcus spp., ranging from 46.7% to 89.8% ( 12 , 13 ).
These results highlight the dynamic nature of microbial populations and their potential shifts over time ( 14 ). The significant prevalence observed underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the microbial landscape in food products, particularly since certain Staphylococcus strains can produce toxins that pose health risks ( 15 ). Therefore, while the presence of Staphylococcus in milk is expected, rigorous monitoring and risk assessment are crucial to ensuring food safety and public health. Comparing the distribution of isolated staphylococcal species with earlier studies reveals both consistencies and disparities. MALDI-TOF confirmation of isolates identified 27% coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) and 73% coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS).
The dominance of CNS in raw milk is a pattern already reported by Elhosseny et al. (2025) ( 16 ), who found 61% CNS vs. 39% CPS, and by Njage et al. (2013) ( 12 ), who reported 55% CNS vs. 45% CPS. In contrast, Kirwa et al. (2021)( 17 ) reported a higher prevalence of CPS compared to CNS (83.6% vs. 16.4%). This variance in CPS prevalence underscores the potential influence of factors such as geographical location, farming practices, and the methods used for isolation and identification in previous studies. Phenotypic characterization by MALDI-TOF identified six species within the Staphylococcus genus. The CPS were represented by S. aureus (17% prevalence) and S. delphini (10%). Numerous studies have reported the presence of S. aureus in raw camel milk at prevalence ranging from 10% to 62% ( 12 , 16 ). A previous study on raw livestock milk from northern Kenya reported 0% contamination by S. aureus in camel milk ( 18 ). This variation in contamination rates is primarily attributed to differences in the methods used to isolate and identify Staphylococcus species. Many studies rely on the presumptive appearance of colonies on agar and biochemical identification using catalase and coagulase tests to confirm S. aureus, whereas our study showed that among the eight coagulase-positive isolates, three were identified as S. delphini. This species has recently been implicated in human infections, with the first documented case described by Magleby et al. ( 19 ).
This highlights the need for using advanced molecular tools to ensure accurate identification of Staphylococcus species. S. delphini has been isolated from various sources, including retail food, poultry meat, bulk and goat milk, and some dairy products ( 20 ). Seligsohn et al. (2020) ( 21 ) have also reported it in camel milk. Among the isolated coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), the dominant species was S. epidermidis, with a prevalence of 37%. These results are consistent with the results of Njage et al. (2013) ( 12 ). The other CNS observed were S. pasteuri, S. simulans, and S. warneri, all of which have already been documented in camel milk, with their distributions varying between studies ( 12 ).
CNS are generally considered to have a low pathogenic potential. However, the longstanding focus on coagulase-positive staphylococci, which were traditionally seen as the strains of primary importance, has likely led to underestimations of the prevalence of enterotoxin-producing CNS ( 12 ). Antibiotic sensitivity testing of the staphylococcal isolates obtained in this study confirmed antibiotic resistance in nearly all isolates (Table 1). Only two isolates were classified as sensitive to all the antibiotics from the various classes tested. Additionally, multi-resistance was demonstrated, with resistance profiles consistently involving penicillin and fosfomycin (Figure1).
The search for methicillin resistance —conducted only on S. epidermidis, resulted in the identification of an isolate classified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS), which was also multi-drug resistant (MDR), therby categorizing it as an MR-MDR CNS. Kirwa et al.(2021) ( 17 ) in Kenya reported that among Staphylococcus spp. isolated from camel milk, the lowest resistance was observed to chloramphenicol and tetracycline (1.6% and 3%), which corroborates the results of this study. However, they also reported high resistance rates to cephalexin (81.9%) and streptomycin (72.1%), whereas our study highlighted high resistance to penicillin (87%) and fosfomycin (40%).
Numerous studies have focused on the antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus species, particularly Staphylococcus aureus from camels. Methicillin resistance has often been the primary focus in research investigating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical isolates from nasal swabs and infectious cases. However, data on the antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus species in camel milk remain scarce. This study represents the first reported case of MR-MDR CNS in camel milk. Multidrug resistance (MDR), often described as the "silent pandemic," was observed in 30% of isolates, with resistance to a β-lactam antibiotic (penicillin) consistently associated.
This multidrug resistance was observed in both coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). The increasing resistance to antibiotics could be attributed to their misuse by herders who self-medicate their camels, as well as the easy access to antibiotics. This study involved a thorough analysis of Staphylococcus contamination and antibiotic susceptibility profiles in camel milk samples collected from various farms in M'sila, Algeria. The findings showed a 100% prevalence of Staphylococcus contamination, with S. epidermidis and S. aureus identified as the predominant species. A high prevalence of resistance to penicillin and multidrug-resistant isolates was observed, indicating a need for enhanced management practices in camel farming to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance. The variety of antibiotic resistance profiles, ranging from single-agent resistance to complex multidrug resistance, illustrates the intricate nature of bacterial resistance mechanisms.
These results offer valuable insights into antimicrobial resistance within camel milk production systems and underscores the importance of ongoing surveillance and responsible antibiotic use practices. Implementing measures to control and prevent the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria should be an integral part of livestock management strategies to protect both animal and public health. The high prevalence of multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MDR-CNS), including methicillin-resistant strains (MR-CNS), poses a direct risk to public health by expanding the resistance gene pool from which pathogenic bacteria can acquire resistance traits.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the staff of the Center for Scientific and Technical Research in Physical and Chemical Analysis (CRAPC) (Bou-Ismail, Tipaza, Algeria). They would like to thank also Louisa Boudjellal; engineer in the HIDAOA laboratory at Higher National Veterinary School (Algiers, Algeria).
Authors' Contribution
Study concept and design: F. M and C.B
Acquisition of data: F.M, C.B and L.B
Analysis and interpretation of data: F.M, C.B and L.B
Drafting of the manuscript: F.M and C.B
Administrative, technical, and material support: F.M, S.L.A, N.L and L.B
Study supervision: F.M and L.B
Ethics
We confirm that we have followed and respected the instructions to the authors. The ethics in publishing policy, and conflicts of interest disclosure on behalf of all authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
The present study was conducted with no financial support.
Data Availability
The authors affirm that all the results are given in this article.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
This study was conducted without using AI.
References
- FAO. The role of camel in sustainable development. Food and Agriculture organization. 2028. [cited 2022 Mar 8]. Available from: http:// www.fao.Org/3/ca 0156en/ca0156en.pdf
- Arain MA, Salman HM, Ali M, Khaskheli GB, Barham GS, Marghazani IB, Ahmed S. A review on camel milk composition, techno-functional properties and processing constraints. Food Sc Anim Resour. 2024; 44(4): 739.
- Rasheed H, Ijaz M, Ahmed A, Ali MM. Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Camel Mastitis. Microb Pathog. 2025; 202:107435.
- Kraimia M, Abdelkader A, Saliha BH, Benaissa MH. Factors influencing the physicochemical and mineral composition of camel milk in eastern Algeria. J Camel Pract Res. 2024; 31(1): 17-24.
- Gebremichael B, Girmay S, Gebru M. Camel milk production and marketing: Pastoral areas of Afar, Ethiopia. Pastoralism. 2029; 9: 16.
- Ahad AA, Megersa B, Edao BM. Brucellosis in camel, small ruminants, and Somali pastoralists in Eastern Ethiopia: a One Health approach. Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11: 1276275.
- Bianchi DM, Romano A, Tramuta C, Distasio P, Decastelli L. A foodborne outbreak caused by staphylococcal enterotoxins in cheese sandwiches in northern Italy. Ital J Food Sci. 2024; 36(4): 136.
- Rakhmatulina A, Abuova A, Issimov A, Faye B. Camel milk processing opportunities: A review. J Camel Pract Res. 2024; 31(3): 237-249.
- Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27 (4): 870-926.
- ISO 6888-1. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species). International Organization for Standardization.1999. [cited 13 Mar 2023]. Available from: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/25571/c293ac71f20448d1bacee2ef1fc247a9/ISO-6888-2-1999.pdf
- Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition. J Clin Microbiol. 2021; 59(12):1-10.
- Njage PMK, Dolci S, Jans C, Wangoh J, Lacroix C, Meile L. Biodiversity and enterotoxigenic potential of staphylococci isolated from raw and spontaneously fermented camel milk. Br Microbiol Res J. 2013; 3(2): 128-138.
- Abera T, Yoseph L, Behar M, Befekadu U. Bacteriological quality of raw camel milk along the market value chain in Fafen zone, Ethiopian Somali regional state. BMC Res Notes. 2016; 9: 1-6.
- Fink JW, Manhart M. How do microbes grow in nature? The role of population dynamics in microbial ecology and evolution. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2023; 36:100470.
- Ferreira MA, Bernardo LG, Neves LS, Campos MRH, Lamaro-Cardoso J, André MCP. Virulence profile and genetic variability of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from artisanal cheese. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(11): 8589-8597.
- Elhosseny M, Gwida M, Elsherbini M, Samra MB, Ashmawy AM. Evaluation of physicochemical properties and microbiological quality of camel milk from Egypt. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2025; 7(3): 92-97.
- Kirwa E, Aboge GO, Maitho TE, Mbindyo CM, Abuom TO, Mainga AO. Antibiotic profile of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococci species isolated from raw camel milk from Garissa County, Kenya. East Afr J Sci. 2021; 2(4): 2021.
- Omwenga I, Aboge GO, Mitema ES, Obiero G, Ngaywa C, Ngwili N, Wamwere G, M, Bett B. Antimicrobial usage and detection of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains in raw milk of livestock from Northern Kenya. Microb Drug Resist. 2021; 27(6): 843-854.
- Magleby R, Bemis DA, Kim D, Carroll KC, Castanheira M, Kania SA, Jenkins SG, Westblade LF:. First reported human isolation of Staphylococcus delphini. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 219; 94(3):274-276.
- Lauková A, Micenková L, Pogány Simonová M, Focková V, Ščerbová J, Tomáška M, Dvorožňáková E, Kološta M. Microbiome Associated with Slovak Traditional Ewe’s Milk Lump Cheese. Process. 2021; 9(9):1603.
- Seligsohn D, Nyman AK, Younan M, Sake W, Persson Y, Bornstein S, Maichomo M, de Verdier K, Morrell JM. Subclinical mastitis in pastoralist dairy camel herds in Isiolo, Kenya: Prevalence, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(5): 4717-4731.