1. Introduction
Obesity, as a result of positive energy balance, is a chronic disease in which various hormones and neurotransmitters are involved. Adipose tissue hormones, adipokines, and cytokines ( 1 , 2 ) such as leptin and adiponectin ( 3 ), brain neuropeptides related to energy homeostasis and appetite, such as neuropeptide Y (NPY) ( 3 , 9 ), gastrointestinal hormones such as insulin, ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), and peptide YY (PYY), and finally peripheral signals participate, such as fatty acids are affected by energy imbalance and obesity ( 4 ). Dietary changes, exercises, and medications are common treatments for obesity ( 5 , 6 ). In obese patients, with changes in energy levels, NPY expression increases, and plasma leptin and insulin levels decrease ( 7 ). Today, the use of dietary supplements is the most common method for managing weight loss. Herbal medicine can be a suitable alternative to these supplements due to their function in reducing lipid and carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes, blocking adipogenesis, and improving energy metabolism ( 8 ). For example, the use of ginseng would prevent food over-intake by affecting leptin resistance, CCK expression, and NPY secretion ( 6 ), or the use of a traditional Japanese Kampo medicine, including 12 natural components (11 plants and a fungus), increase intracellular calcium in NPY neurons to treat anorexia ( 8 ). Oxidative stress (OS) and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) can affect obesity. The OS plays a critical role in obesity-related disorders. In this regard, the benefits of antioxidant supplements such as carnitine and vitamins in obesity management were studied and proved ( 9 ). Investigating herbal plants with antioxidant activity is vital. Studies have shown that these plants can affect the expression of genes associated with obesity, including inflammation ( 10 , 11 ). Dactylorhiza maculate (Salep) belongs to the orchid family; it has many species and grows almost all over the world. Despite its proven antioxidant role, this plant contains water-soluble fiber called glucomannan, which has long been known for its role in weight loss, blood sugar control, and cholesterol reduction ( 12 ). This component can control body weight by reducing the rate of emptying and absorbing in the digestive system, increasing the secretion of CCK, and regulating the secretion of leptin ( 13 ). In this study, we attempted to investigate the role of the hydro-alcoholic extract of Orchis maculate L. roots on obesity and its related hormones in male Wistar rats. The benefit (efficiency) of Salep extract on neuropeptide-Y, agouti protein, insulin, leptin, ghrelin, cholecystokinin, amylin, orexin-A, obestatin, adiponectin, chemerin, omentin-1, epinephrine, and resistin was investigated.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Salep Extract
Around 100 g Salep roots were mixed with ethyl alcohol (500 cc) and placed in a rotary for 24 h in a cool environment. The filtered solution was mixed by centrifugation (5 min/3,000 rpm). The solution was kept constant, at room temperature, for 48 h to turn into a solid and dry alcohol-free extract. The obtained dry extract was dissolved in distilled water ( 14 ).
2.2. Determination of Extract Purification
2.2.1. Phenol and Flavonoid Determination:
Phenol and flavonoid measurement was performed according to the Tali procedure kit. The flavonoid concentration based on the quercetin standard curve was reported (40.96 µg/ml), and phenol concentration based on a gallic acid standard curve in 100mg/ml Salep extract (8.81 mg/ml) was reported.
2.2.2. Total Antioxidant Activity Determination:
The antioxidant activity of the extract (39.7%) was assessed using the ROS inhibitory method called 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl DPPH. In this way, first, 1 ml of Salep extract is combined with 3 ml of DPPH methanolic solution. Then, it is stored in a dark and warm place for 30 min. After that, the absorbance of the solution was read in 517 ɲm wavelength. Methanol was also used as a blank sample ( 15 ). Finally, inhibitory activity was calculated based on the following formula:
% Inhibitory activity= [(Acontrol-Asample)/Aconntrol] *100
2.3. Animals of Study
Forty male Wistar rats (180-200 mg/kg, aged 8-9 weeks) were used with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h, 23 ± 2oC room temperature, 50-55% humidity, and free access to food (Don Pars, Iran), and water.
2.4. Study Design
Animals were divided into six groups: control group (received no substances), sham group (1ml of distilled water and alcohol (50:50)), and four doses of hydroalcoholic extract of Salep, 80, 160, and 380 mg/kg (Sa 80, 160, and 380 mg/kg). Experiments were conducted according to the Ethics Committee of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences guideline (Ethics Code: IR.JUMS.REC.1395.032). The extracts were fed to animals daily by gavage (9-10 a.m.) for 29 days. Animals’ glucose level was assessed, using tail blood, on days (zero, seventh, 14th, 21st, and 28th days).
2.5. Sample Collection
After the 29th day, blood samples were collected from the weighted animals; they were anesthetized using Ketamine (100 mg/kg) and Xylazine (20 mg/kg), and the heart, arterial blood, and tissue of sacrificed animals were extracted ( 16 ). Then, their serum was collected by the centrifugal device (for 15 min and 3,000 rpm) and kept at -20°C until the experiment’s time. To measure the Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH), Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (LH) GnRH, FSH, LH, estrogen, and progesterone hormones, ELIZA kits for rats made by Shanghai Crystal Day Biotech Company were used.
2.6. Biochemical Analysis
The samples were used to determine blood insulin (Cat. n:E0707Ra; Assay Range: 0.1-40 mIU/L; Sensivity: 0.05), AgRP (Cat. n:E1274Ra; Assay Range: 5-1500 ng/L; Sensivity: 2.43), adiponectin (Cat. n:E0858Ra; Assay Range: 0.2-60 mg/L; Sensivity: 0.12), leptin (Cat. n:E0561Ra; Assay Range: 0.1-20 ng/ml; Sensivity: 0.05), resistin (Cat. n:E0211Ra; Assay Range: 5-1000 pg/ml; Sensivity: 2.52), obestatin (Cat. n:E0229Ra; Assay Range: 10-3000 ng/L; Sensivity: 5.17), omentin (Cat. n:E0607Ra; Assay Range: 2-600 ng/L; Sensivity: 1.12), cholecystokinin (Cat. n:E0199Ra; Assay Range: 5-2000 ng/L; Sensivity: 2.52), epinephrine (Cat. n:E0545Ra; Assay Range: 0.5-200 ng/ml; Sensivity: 0.26), amylin (Cat. n:E0718Ra; Assay Range: 0.5-200 ng/L; Sensivity: 0.29), Chemerin (Cat. n:E0864Ra; Assay Range: 1-300 ng/L; Sensivity: 0.52), NPY (Cat. n:E0540Ra; Assay Range: 3-900 ng/L; Sensivity: 1.46), ghrelin (Cat. n:E0896Ra; Assay Range: 50-10000 ng/L; Sensivity: 20.59), and orexin-A (Cat. n:E0105Ra; Assay Range: 0.3-1500 ng/L; Sensivity: 0.15), Malondialdehyde (MDA) (Cat. n:E0156Ra; Assay Range: 0.05-10 nmol/ml; Sensivity: 0.024), Glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) (Cat. n:E0814Ra; Assay Range: 5-1000 U/ml; Sensivity: 2.21), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (Cat. n:E0871Ra; Assay Range: 0.2-60 U/ml; Sensivity: 0.11), and total oxidant status (TOS) (Cat. n:E1512Ra; Assay Range: 0.2-60 U/ml; Sensivity: 0.13) level were also evaluated by Rat ELISA kits (SHANGHAICRYSTAL DAY BIOTECH COMPANY-CHINA). Lipid profile factors (triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL (low-density lipoprotein), and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) evaluated by Pishtazteb kits.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
The collected data was analyzed by a one-way ANOVA test using SPSS software (version 21) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Differences between groups for continuous variables were examined using post hoc Duncan and Tukey tests.
3. Results
Evaluation of weight changes demonstrated that using Salep could help to reduce animals’ weight loss. The groups receiving 160 and 320 mg/kg Salep had more weight loss than the control group and the lower doses (P≤0.05; Figure 1). The evaluation of Agouti Related Neuropeptide (AgRP) and NPY in different doses showed a significant increase in NPY in the higher dose compared to the lower doses and the control group, while AgRP did not show a significant change. Glucose assessment was done over 28 days (days 0, 7, 17, 21, and 28), and data demonstrated that Salep (160 and 320 mg/kg) did not change the glucose level of animals on days 0, 7, and 14, but it was effective on days 21 and 28. The evaluation of these days showed that the use of Salep reduced animals’ blood glucose dose-independently, higher doses, lower blood sugar (Figure 1). Leptin showed a significant increase in groups treated with 160 and 320 mg/kg compared to the control group. Higher dosages of Salep were more effective than lower doses. The evaluating ghrelin and insulin indifferent doses showed a significant increase in each dose compared to lower doses and control group (Figure 2). The mean concentrations of cholecystokinin, amylin, omentin, epinephrine, and obestatin in the Salep group showed a significant increase compared to the control group. At the same time, different groups also showed significant differences. Furthermore, the evaluation of adiponectin revealed this effect compared to the control group, although only the highest dose had a significant effect on the concentration of this hormone. Examination of chemerin, orexin-A, and resistin at different concentrations showed that Salep usage (160 and 320 mg/kg) controlled these factors. Examining the effectiveness of Salep showed a significant difference between higher and lower doses of resistin and chemerin. It was also found that higher concentrations greatly reduce orexin-A (Table 1). The lipid profile of different groups is evaluated in Table 2. The HDL increased in Salep groups compared to the control group (P≤0.05), while LDL, TC, and TG were significantly lower in Salep 160 and 320 mg/kg. Comparing groups showed that 320 mg/kg Salep is more effective in reducing these factors (P≤0.05; Table 2). Evaluation of TAC, Superoxide dismutase SOD, and GSHPx showed the antioxidant properties of Salep. Three higher doses of Salep (80, 160, and 320 mg/kg) significantly altered TAC and GSHPx levels. At the same time, there were no differences in SOD levels between 160 and 320 mg/kg. Comparing treatment groups showed the role of Salep in MDA level; higher doses were more effective than lower ones (Table 3).
Groups | Control | Sham | Sa 80 mg/kg | Sa 160 mg/kg | Sa 320 mg/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resistin (Mean ± SEM) | 175 ± 3.93d | 176.58 ± 3.13 d | 145.55 ± 2.38 c | 161.64 ± 2.43 b | 117.63 ± 2.38a |
Agouti-related peptid (Mean ± SEM) | 148.87 ±2.88 a | 146.65 ± 2.16 a | 144.73 ± 3.70 a | 138.42 ± 4.35 a | 136.86 ± 7.10 a |
Obestatin (Mean ± SEM) | 105.17 ± 3.08 a | 103.11 ± 3.12 a | 125.54 ± 2.64 b | 137.15 ± 2.65 c | 149.86 ± 3.33 d |
Cholecystokinin (Mean ± SEM) | 1109.42 ± 12.2 a | 1091.13 ± 14.1 a | 1199.98 ± 14.1b | 1282.83 ± 12.1 c | 1370.92 ± 12.7d |
Chemerin (Mean ± SEM) | 26.80 ± 0.71 c | 25.99 ± 0.78 c | 25.54 ± 0.85 c | 21.98 ± 0.90 b | 14.69 ± 0.61 a |
Orexin (Mean ± SEM) | 241.96 ± 3.83 b | 240.08 ± 4.08 b | 236.59 ± 3.91 b | 229.40 ± 2.64 b | 170.80 ± 6.07 a |
Omentin-1 (Mean ± SEM) | 5.39 ± 0.21 a | 5.46 ± 0.22 a | 5.41 ± 0.15 a | 6.66 ± 0.32 b | 8.49 ± 0.33 c |
Amylin (Mean ± SEM) | 28.71 ± 0.90 a | 26.65 ± 0.93 a | 27.59 ± 2.12 a | 34.05 ± 1.22 b | 48.40 ± 1.73 c |
Epinephrine (Mean ± SEM) | 47.53 ± 1.67 a | 49.13 ± 1.48 a | 49.20 ± 1.77 a | 55.61 ± 2.29b | 72.56 ± 2.46 c |
Adiponectin (Mean ± SEM) | 10.05 ± 0.19 a | 9.98 ± 0.21 a | 10.26 ± 0.24 ab | 11.14 ± 0.47 b | 13.44 ± 0.37 c |
Each group means with at least one shared letter has no significant difference. P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. |
Groups | Control | Sham | Sa 80 mg/kg | Sa 160 mg/kg | Sa 320 mg/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Cholesterol (Mean ± SEM) | 53.63 ± 4.54 c | 50.50 ± 1.66 c | 45.00 ±3.98 bc | 41.00 ± 2.56 ab | 33.38 ±1.22 a |
Low-density lipoprotein (Mean ± SEM) | 111.25 ± 3.67 c | 113.00 ± 3.23 c | 91.75 ± 8.39 b | 80.25 ± 6.98 b | 32.13 ± 3.08 a |
High-density lipoprotein (Mean ± SEM) | 21.75 ± 0.49 a | 22.38 ± 0.86 a | 27.50 ± 1.95 b | 33.25 ± 1.69 c | 36.38 ± 1.78 c |
Triglyceride (Mean ± SEM) | 131.13 ± 2.97 c | 126.63 ± 4.83 c | 116.00 ± 4.66 bc | 106.50 ± 5.55 b | 63.50 ± 7.24 a |
Each group means with at least one shared letter has no significant difference. P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. |
Groups | Control | Sham | Sa 80 mg/kg | Sa 160 mg/kg | Sa 320 mg/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAC (Mean ± SEM) | 3.42 ± 0.16 a | 3.57 ± 0.16 a | 4.24 ± 0.11 b | 4.59 ± 0.19 bc | 5.00 ± 0.08 c |
SOD (Mean ± SEM) | 3.37 ± 0.34 a | 3.55 ± 0.29 a | 4.01± 0.17 a | 5.02 ± 0.29 b | 5.60 ± 0.29 b |
MDA (Mean ± SEM) | 1.66 ± 0.04 d | 1.57 ± 0.07 d | 1.41± 0.03 c | 1.21 ± 0.02 b | 1.06 ± 0.03 a |
GSHPx (Mean ± SEM) | 60.33 ± 3.08 a | 62.09 ± 2.73 a | 67.02 ± 3.31 a | 81.97 ± 1.83 b | 97.01± 3.28 c |
TOS (Mean ± SEM) | 1.08 ± 0.02 d | 1.04 ± 0.02 d | 0.92 ± 0.02 c | 0.78 ± 0.02 b | 0.58 ±0.02 a |
TOS/TAC (Mean ± SEM) | 0.32 ± 0.01 d | 0.29 ± 0.01 d | 0.22 ± 0.01 c | 0.17 ± 0.01 b | 0.12± 0.00 a |
Each group means with at least one shared letter has no significant difference. P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. |
4. Discussion
The role of plants in weight loss and obesity has been investigated in many studies ( 8 , 17 , 18 ); our study demonstrated the role of Salep on weight loss and obesity-related hormones in animals. Animals treated with Salep had altered appetite hormones and lipid profiles, and this herb had changed the antioxidative system. Salep had increased antioxidants such as SOD, TAC, and GSHPx. On the other hand, treated animals had reduced MDA. Calculation of the TOS/TAC ratio showed that increasing TAC reduced this ratio. The antioxidant potential of this plant was investigated in previous studies ( 14 , 19 ). These studies believed that Salep flavonoids, polyphenols, and glucomannan are the main factors affecting the antioxidant system ( 19 , 20 ). Quercetin, a known Salep flavonoid, reduces lipoxygenase and affects gene expression of the oxidative system enzymes ( 20 ). Although Salep administration affected appetite-related neuropeptides (e.g., NPY), it had no effect on AgRP. Another member of this family, Ocimum sanctum Linn ethanolic extract (OSE), affected NPY concentration due to its role in hippocampal area neurons ( 21 ). Although this study aimed to investigate the effects of OSE on hippocampal neurons in Alzheimer’s animal models, a significant increase in NPY expression OSE groups was found. We believe that OSE can stimulate NPY expression. However, previous studies showed that obesity causes long-lasting desensitization of AgRP neurons, and perhaps because of this desensitization, our plant could not affect AgRP in the short term and needs more time ( 22 ). The results illustrated that ghrelin decreased and obestatin increased. These hormone balance changes in response to diet or before and after meals ( 23 ). In addition, exercise decreases ghrelin or increases obestatin levels ( 24 ). Various studies have investigated the role of CCK on meal patterns and caloric intake ( 25 ); our results showed an increase in the level of CCK, which is in agreement with the role of some other herbs ( 26 ). Data analysis showed that Salep increases the secretion of amylin and weight loss impacted by this plant. The effect of plants on gastrointestinal hormones needs further investigation. Insulin promotes triglyceride storage, fatty acid uptake, and their related gene expression; on the other hand, obesity alters adipocytes and muscle metabolism, so insulin balance is essential in controlling obesity. Salep extract affects animal insulin and glucose and reduces obesity. Animals receiving Salep had reduced resistin and chemerin; it also increased epinephrine and omentin compared to the control group. The role of different plants in disrupting fatty acid-synthesizing enzymes and lipid metabolism was investigated in many studies ( 27 , 28 ). With the proven role of adipose tissue-related hormones in obesity, the success of Salep in obesity could be through its effect on adipose tissues. The role of leptin and adiponectin in obesity is obvious; therefore, our study illustrated that the use of Salep not only increased leptin but also affected adiponectin in treated animals. Several studies showed this positive relationship between different herbs and serum adiponectin. Still these studies believed the benefits of herbs for leptin reduction, which agreed with our data ( 29 ). In conclusion, this study indicated that supplementation with Salep extract improves animal weight loss, especially at higher doses. These findings suggest that Salep reduces NPY and orexin-A, thereby suppressing appetite. This herb also increases obestatin and CCK and reduces ghrelin. Furthermore, Salep has the power to alter secretory factors of adipose tissue to lose weight and reduce lipid profile.
Acknowledgment
This study was approved by the Student Research Committee of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Fars, Iran. We appreciate and thank the students who helped us in carrying out this project (Hadi Khatonaki, Farzane Biglarnia, Nasim Nabizadeh, Hoda Behjoo, Hanieh Mohtashamnia, and Meysam Haghighi).
Authors' Contribution
Acquisition of data: H.H, H.K.J, N.S.J, R.M, S.R, N.S, M.D, and S.D
Analysis and interpretation of data: H.K.J, B.E, and M.M
Drafting of the manuscript: H.H, M.M, B.E, M.D, and H.K.J
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All of the authors
Statistical analysis: H.K.J, H.H and M.M
Administrative, technical, and material support: H.K.J and N.S.J
Study supervision: All of the authors
Ethics
Experiments were conducted according to the Ethics Committee of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.JUMS.REC.1395.032).
Conflict of Interest
Authors disclose any conflict of interest in accordance with journal policy.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
- Marques-Oliveira GH, Silva TM, Lima WG, Valadares HMS, Chaves VEJP. Insulin as a hormone regulator of the synthesis and release of leptin by white adipose tissue. 2018; 106:49-58.
- Miller GDJAjolm. Appetite regulation: hormones, peptides, and neurotransmitters and their role in obesity. 2019; 13(6):586-601.
- Selthofer-Relatić K, Radić R, Stupin A, Šišljagić V, Bošnjak I, Bulj N, et al. Leptin/adiponectin ratio in overweight patients-gender differences. 2018; 15(3):260-2.
- Mesgari-Abbasi M, Abbasalizad Farhangi M. Serum concentrations of cholecystokinin, peptide YY, ghrelin and high sensitive C-reactive protein in association with metabolic syndrome ingredients in obese individuals. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar).. 2020; 16(1):37-42.
- Gaesser GA, Angadi SS. Obesity treatment: Weight loss versus increasing fitness and physical activity for reducing health risks. iScience. 2021; 24(10):102995.
- Park HJ, Rhie SJ, Shim I. Neuronal mechanisms of ginseng on antiobesity effects: implication of its synergistic benefits with physical exercise. J Exerc Rehabil. 2021; 17(6):388-94.
- de Rijke CE, Hillebrand JJ, Verhagen LA, Roeling TA, Adan RA. Hypothalamic neuropeptide expression following chronic food restriction in sedentary and wheel-running rats. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005; 35(2):381-90.
- Goswami C, Dezaki K, Wang L, Inui A, Seino Y, Yada T. Ninjin'yoeito Targets Distinct Ca(2+) Channels to Activate Ghrelin-Responsive vs. Unresponsive NPY Neurons in the Arcuate Nucleus. Front Nutr. 2020; 7:104 .
- Abdali D, Samson SE, Grover AK. How effective are antioxidant supplements in obesity and diabetes?. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2015; 24(3):201-15.
- Pérez-Torres I, Castrejón-Téllez V, Soto ME, Rubio-Ruiz ME, Manzano-Pech L, Guarner-Lans VJIJoMS. Oxidative stress, plant natural antioxidants, and obesity. 2021; 22(4):1786.
- Xu C, Mathews AE, Rodrigues C, Eudy BJ, Rowe CA, O'Donoughue A, et al. Aged garlic extract supplementation modifies inflammation and immunity of adults with obesity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018; 24:148-55.
- Tekinşen KK, Güner A. Chemical composition and physicochemical properties of tubera salep produced from some Orchidaceae species. Food Chemistry. 2010; 121(2):468-71.
- Keithley J, Swanson B. Glucomannan and obesity: a critical review. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005; 11(6):30-4.
- Atashpour S, Kargar Jahromi H, Kargar Jahromi Z, Zarei S. Antioxidant effects of aqueous extract of Salep on Paraquat-induced rat liver injury. World J Hepatol. 2017; 9(4):209-16.
- Behbahani BA, Noshad M, Falah F. Cumin essential oil: Phytochemical analysis, antimicrobial activity and investigation of its mechanism of action through scanning electron microscopy. Microbial pathogenesis. 2019; 136:103716.
- Wellington D, Mikaelian I, Singer LJJotAAfLAS. Comparison of ketamine–xylazine and ketamine–dexmedetomidine anesthesia and intraperitoneal tolerance in rats. 2013; 52(4):481-7.
- Shirali S, Hosseini SA, Ashtary-Larky D, Daneghian M, Mirlohi M-S. Effect of caffeine co-ingested with carnitine on weight, body-fat percent, serum leptin and lipid profile changes in male teen soccer players: A randomized clinical trial. International journal of pediatrics. 2016; 4(10):3685-98.
- Shojaei M, Yousefi AR, Zendehdel M, Khodadadi M. Food Intake Regulation in Birds: the Role of Neurotransmitters and Hormones. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2020; 14(1)
- Jahromi HK, Pourahmad M, Abedi HA, Jahromi ZKJJot, medicine c. Protective effects of salep against isoniazid liver toxicity in wistar rats. 2018; 8(1):239-43.
- Ekrami M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Ghoreishy SA, Najari Z, Shakoury N. Characterization of a high-performance edible film based on Salep mucilage functionalized with pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium). Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 133:529-37.
- Mataram MBA, Hening P, Harjanti FN, Karnati S, Wasityastuti W, Nugrahaningsih DAA, et al. The neuroprotective effect of ethanolic extract Ocimum sanctum Linn. in the regulation of neuronal density in hippocampus areas as a central autobiography memory on the rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of chemical neuroanatomy. 2021; 111:101885.
- Beutler LR, Corpuz TV, Ahn JS, Kosar S, Song W, Chen Y, et al. Obesity causes selective and long-lasting desensitization of AgRP neurons to dietary fat. Elife. 2020; 9
- Aly GS, Hassan NE, Anwar GM, Ahmed HH, El-Masry SA, El-Banna RA, et al. Ghrelin, obestatin and the ghrelin/obestatin ratio as potential mediators for food intake among obese children: a case control study. 2020; 33(2):199-204.
- Villarreal D, Pradhan G, Zhou Y, Xue B, Sun Y. Diverse and Complementary Effects of Ghrelin and Obestatin. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(4):517.
- Miller LJ, Harikumar KG, Wootten D, Sexton PM. Roles of Cholecystokinin in the Nutritional Continuum. Physiology and Potential Therapeutics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:684656.
- Celestino MM, Gomes AC, Botelho PB, Gambero A, Mesquita LM, Vilegas W, et al. South American herbal extracts reduce food intake through modulation of gastrointestinal hormones in overweight and obese women. Journal of Functional Foods. 2017; 35:555-63.
- Martin BR. Complementary medicine therapies that may assist with weight loss: a narrative review. Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2019; 18(2):115-26.
- Pourteymour Fard Tabrizi F, Abbasalizad Farhangi M, Vaezi M, Hemmati SJPR. Changes of body composition and circulating neopterin, omentin‐1, and chemerin in response to thylakoid‐rich spinach extract with a hypocaloric diet in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. 2021; 35(5):2594-606.
- Khoramipour K, Chamari K, Hekmatikar AA, Ziyaiyan A, Taherkhani S, Elguindy NM, et al. Adiponectin: Structure, Physiological Functions, Role in Diseases, and Effects of Nutrition. Nutrients. 2021; 13(4):1180.