Molecular study of Anaplasma spp. in horses, sheep, and goats with phylogenetic analysis in northwest Iran

1. Introduction

Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma ovis are obligate intracellular bacteria transmitted by ticks. Anaplasma phagocytophilum can replicate in granulocytic leukocytes (neutrophils and eosinophils), causing granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans, horses, dogs, and cats, as well as tick-borne fever in ruminants ( 1 ). In horses, A. phagocytophilum can induce both subclinical and acute clinical disease with an incubation period of 1-3 weeks characterized by high fever, lethargy, lack of appetite, staggering or ataxia, reluctance to move, limb edema, and mucous membranes petechiae ( 2 ). Although the disease can occur at any age in horses, its severity is higher in horses over four years old. The geographic distribution of infected horses and ticks plays a crucial role in spreading the disease among horses worldwide ( 3 ). The main tick vectors of the disease are Ixodes, Dermacentor, Rhipicephalus, Hyaloma, and Hemophysalis species, varying by geographic region ( 4 ). Anaplasma ovis mainly affects the erythrocytes of sheep and goats, and it has been detected in wild ungulates, such as roe and red deer. This highly host-specific pathogen causes ovine anaplasmosis in sheep ( 1 ). Although Anaplasma ovis can be more pathogenic in horses than in sheep, it depends on the strain that causes the disease and on the breed of the animal ( 5 ). Even though sheep typically experience a subclinical form of the disease, exposure to various stressors, including hot weather, improper sanitary conditions, severe tick infestations, long transportations, and simultaneous infections, can lead to the clinical form ( 6 ). Clinical signs include intermittent fever, anorexia, severe emaciation, impaired fertility, abortion in pregnant animals, and the jaundice of mucous membranes, especially following the acute stage ( 7 ). In cases of acute A. phagocytophilum infections, the presence of intracellular inclusions known as morulae in neutrophils and eosinophils can be used to make a diagnosis. A definitive diagnosis requires more than three morulae in a blood smear. However, the diagnosis can be challenging based on microscopic methods, particularly in cases of low-level infection and subclinical forms of the disease ( 3 ). Similar challenges exist in diagnosing A. ovis in sheep and goats. Hence, serological and molecular methods detect subclinical and latent infections more efficiently ( 8 ). Molecular methods demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity in identifying Anaplasma species. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with amplification of the 16S rRNA and msp4 genes can detect A. phagocytophilum in horses and A. ovis in sheep and goats, respectively ( 9 ). Several molecular studies have been performed in different parts of Iran to identify various Anaplasma species in farm animals ( 10 - 13 ). However, the lack of information regarding the status of anaplasmosis in horses and small ruminants in northwest Iran, coupled with the importance of identifying carrier animals to prevent the spread of this disease, highlights the necessity for further research on this subject. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the infection rate of A. phagocytophilum in horses in Ardabil province, Iran, and A. ovis in small ruminants in East Azerbaijan province, Iran, using the nested-PCR method.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Area and Sampling

A cross-sectional study was conducted for the molecular identification of A. phagocytophilum in horses in Ardabil province and A. ovis in sheep and goats in East Azerbaijan province during the spring and summer seasons of 2016 in northwest Iran. Blood samples were obtained from 100 healthy horses in the cities of Ardabil, Nir, Namin, Sareyn, and Meshginshahr in Ardabil province, and 156 healthy sheep and goats (116 sheep and 40 goats) in the cities of East Azerbaijan province, including Tabriz, Bostan Abad, Azarshahr, Hashtroud, Jolfa, and Charuymaq. Blood Samples were collected from the jugular vein using tubes containing the anticoagulant EDTA-K2. The characteristics of all the sampled animals, including age, gender, and sampling location, were recorded. Subsequently, the samples were quickly transferred to the laboratory under frozen conditions and kept at -20°C until molecular tests.

2.2 DNA Extraction

DNA extraction from whole blood followed by the kit manufacturer's instructions (Yekta Tajhiz Azma Co, Tehran, Iran). Briefly, 20 µl proteinase K and 200 µl BG buffer were added to 200 µl blood. The sample was mixed and incubated at 60°C for 15 min, and then, 200 µl ethanol was added. The mixture was transferred into the BG column, and the effluent was discarded after centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 1 min. Finally, the columns were rinsed with 200 µl washing buffer and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 2 min, and extracted DNA was kept at -20°C until the PCR test.

2.3 PCR Reactions

The DNA samples were analyzed for the presence of the A. phagocytophilum16S rRNA gene and the A. ovismsp4 gene using nested PCR on a thermocycler (BioRad T100, Germany). For the detection of the A. phagocytophilum16S rRNA gene, the first amplification reaction was performed using F1 and R1 primers (Table 1) and 2 μl of DNA template in a 20 μl reaction mixture containing 0.50 μM of each primer, two units of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.20 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix, 1.50 mM MgCl₂, and 1× PCR buffer. The cycling conditions were as follows: 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 sec, annealing at 55 °C for 30 sec, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The nested amplification was performed using F2 and R2 primers (Table 1) in a 50-μl reaction mixture containing 1 μl of the primary PCR product, 200 mM of each dNTP, 1.25 U of Taq polymerase, and 0.20 mM of each primer. The cycling conditions were the same as the first amplification. Successful amplification was confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the size of the amplicons was determined by comparing it with the DNA marker. The obtained sequence was used as a positive control after confirming its identity with the corresponding sequences available in GenBank. For A. ovis msp4 gene, the first-round amplification was performed with F3 and R3 primers (Table 1). The cycling conditions were 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The nested PCR was performed using F4 and R4 primers (Table 1) in a 25-μl reaction mixture containing 1 μl of the first-round PCR product, 1.75 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.20 mM of dNTP mix, 1.50 mM of MgCl₂, and 2.50 μl of 10 × PCR buffer. The cycling conditions were the same as the first amplification. Successful amplification was confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and sterile distilled water was used as the negative control.

2.4 Sequence Analysis of the msp4 gene and Phylogenetic Analysis

PCR products were sequenced in both forward and reverse directions (ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer Applied Biosystems, USA). The obtained sequences were used as positive controls in PCR assays after the confirmation of their identity with the corresponding sequences available at GenBank. Sequence analyses were carried out by nBLAST search in GenBank or by using the Clustal w method. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining algorithm of the Mega 4 software using the msp4 gene sequence of A. ovis (outgroup). The msp4 gene sequence of A. ovis obtained in this study was assigned accession number MH790273.

2.5 Statistical Analysis

The Chi-square test of independence was used to determine the relationship between age, gender, species, and sampling location with positive cases of A. ovis in sheep and goats and A. phagocytophilum in horses. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS, version 22, IBM statistics®, USA), and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1 PCR Results for A. phagocytophilum

Blood samples collected from 100 healthy horses in rural areas of Ardabil, Nir, Namin, Sareyn, and Meshginshahr were analyzed. The age, gender, and sampling locations of the horses are presented in table 2. Both first-stage and nested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene showed that none of the horses were infected with A. phagocytophilum (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Electrophoresis of Nested PCR reaction products targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Column 1: negative sample, columns 2, 4 and 5: positive control, column 3: negative control for the second PCR, column 6: DNA marker, column 7: negative control, column 8: positive control, column 9: negative sample for the first PCR.

3.2 PCR Results for A. ovis and Phylogenetic Analysis

The nested PCR reaction for the msp4 gene of A. ovis successfully amplified the desired fragments (Figure 2). Out of 156 blood samples from sheep and goats of East Azerbaijan province, 11 (7.05%) tested positive for A. ovis. No significant relationship was found between A. ovis infection and the age of the studied animals. Among the 156 sheep and goats, 37 were one year old or younger, of which only 1 (2.71%) tested positive. In contrast, 119 samples were over one year old, of which 10 (8.40%) were tested positive (Table 3). In this study, among the positive samples, two cases were male (10.00%), and 9 were female (6.62%), with no significant relationship between gender and A. ovis infection (Table 3). As shown in table 3, out of the 156 small ruminants examined, 116 were sheep, and 9 (7.75%) tested positive for A. ovis. Additionally, 2 (5.00%) out of 40 goats were infected with A. ovis, with no significant relationship between the species and the level of infection with A. ovis. While no significant relationship between A. ovis infection and sampling location was identified, the infection rate was higher in Hashtroud and Charuymaq districts (Table 3).

Figure 2. Electrophoresis of Nested PCR reaction products targeting the msp4 gene. Column 1: DNA Marker, column 2: The fragment obtained from the first reaction is 870 bp, amplified at 60°C with a MgCl₂ concentration of 1.5 mM, column 3: The fragment resulting from the second reaction is 418 bp, amplified at 56°C with a MgCl₂ concentration of 1.5 mM.

Sequencing results revealed that the amplified gene fragments of the msp4 gene of A. ovis exhibited a high identity (98-100%) with the sequences in the GeneBank. Furthermore, the sequences obtained in the present study had 100% and 99% identity with the previously recorded sequences of JQ621903.1 and JQ663993.1, respectively, from Iran ( 14 ). The phylogenetic tree (Figure 3) shows that the sequence obtained in the present study (MH790273) was closely related to various sequences obtained from different parts of the world, including Mongolia (LC141077.1), Sudan (MG778620.1), China (KX236056.1), Greece (FJ460455.1), Hungary (EF190513.1), Tunisia (KM285222.1), China (KM246804.1), and Iran (JQ663993.1). However, the sequence obtained in this study was relatively different from some sequences recorded from Sudan (KU497705.1), Iran (KY091899.1), Italy (DQ674249.1), and America (AF393742.1). It is also more distantly related to sequences from Tunisia (KC432644.1) and Iran (EU925811.1).

Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasm ovis based on msp4 gene complete cds.

4. Discussion

In this study, the nested PCR method was used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene in blood samples taken from indigenous horses of Ardabil province, showing no infection with A. phagocytophilum. There has been no prior study on the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in Iranian horses. This disease was first reported in California, USA, in 1969 and has since been identified on multiple continents, including Europe, Asia, and Africa ( 4 ). In contrast to the present study, which did not detect a positive case of A. phagocytophilum infection using the PCR method, several studies in neighboring countries of Iran identified this organism in horses ( 15 , 16 ). In a study conducted on 210 horses in Pakistan, the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum was found to be 4.3% using the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method ( 15 ). Recently, a study in Iraq reported the infection rate of A. phagocytophilum in 160 racing horses of Arabian, Thoroughbred, and mixed breeds, 6.88% by microscopic method and 13.13% by using the PCR method ( 16 ). In general, PCR can detect the infection 2-3 days prior to the appearance of clinical signs and up to 129 days after the animal infection with A. phagocytophilum. The persistent nature of the infection may result in positive PCR tests if the animal undergoes stress ( 2 ). Considering this, the reasons for the negative results of the PCR test in the present study can be attributed to the absence of active infection in the tested horses, the passing of a considerable time since the animal’s exposure to A. phagocytophilum, or the lack of exposure to tick vectors of the disease. Although there are no molecular studies on the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in horses in Iran for comparison, some studies have reported its prevalence in ruminants. The prevalence rates of A. phagocytophilum in cows from Isfahan and Lorestan provinces were 1.33% and 2.00% ( 17 , 18 ), while they were 0.48% (1/206) and 1.82% (3/164) in sheep and goats from Hamadan province, respectively ( 19 ). The results of these studies demonstrated a low level of A. phagocytophilum infection in ruminants. However, two larger-scale molecular studies using the nested PCR method on the 16S rRNA gene detected A. phagocytophilum in 1,851 cows and 1,782 sheep from 4 climatic areas of Iran. The overall prevalence was 15.50% ( 13 ) in cows and 8.10% in sheep ( 10 ), indicating a higher prevalence when compared to previous studies. It should be noted that the very high prevalence rate of A. phagocytophilum in cows from some provinces, such as Kurdistan (47.50%), Semnan (32.70%), Gilan (33.00%), and Mazandaran (20.00%), influenced the overall prevalence rate in the study conducted by Noaman (2020) ( 13 ). Out of 222 blood samples examined in that study, there were no positive cases of A. phagocytophilum in cows from West Azerbaijan province. These findings were consistent with those of the present study, possibly because of the similar climatic conditions. Anaplasmosis in small ruminants caused by A. ovis is a disease distributed worldwide ( 20 ). It is one of the most common tick-borne diseases in Mediterranean countries such as Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal, and Romania ( 6 ). In Iran's neighboring countries, such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan, A. ovis infection has been also reported in small ruminants ( 21 - 24 ). In addition, there have been reports regarding infections in small ruminants in some regions of Iran caused by this organism ( 8 , 14 , 25 ). In the present study, 11 out of 156 (7.05%) blood samples collected from sheep and goats in East Azerbaijan province were positive for the presence of the msp4 gene related to A. ovis, showing a low level of infection with this organism in small ruminants. In a molecular study conducted in West Azerbaijan province, the frequency of A. ovis in healthy sheep was only 5% (5/100), which was similar to the findings of the present study ( 8 ). The reasons for similarity could be related to common geographical and climatic conditions between the two provinces, the tick population, and the similarity in the technique used for identifying the organism. In Kurdistan province, west of Iran, the infection rate of A. ovis using the nested PCR method targeting the msp4 gene was 10% (20/200), which was similar to the present study ( 11 ). Recently, a molecular study with the nested-PCR method targeting the msp4 gene on 1,842 sheep in nine provinces of Iran reported an overall prevalence of 28.30% of A. ovis in sheep ( 12 ). However, Khuzestan and Mazandaran provinces, with respectively infection rates of 70% and 58.90%, increased the overall prevalence of A. ovis in this study. In contrast, the samples from West Azerbaijan province, neighboring East Azerbaijan province, showed the prevalence of A. ovis in sheep to be 5% (10/200), aligning with the results of the present study ( 12 ). Nevertheless, some studies have reported a higher prevalence of A. ovis in sheep and goats, which contradicts the findings of this study. In a study using a PCR-RFLP method, the prevalence of A. ovis was reported to be 63.70% in 193 goats from Khorasan Razavi and Golestan provinces ( 25 ). Similarly, the infection rates of A. ovis were estimated at 33.60% and 87.40% in 119 sheep in Ahvaz using microscopic and PCR-RFLP methods, respectively ( 14 ). Moreover, in a study conducted by the PCR method in eastern Turkey, the overall prevalence of A. ovis in sheep and goats was 67.06% (283/422) ( 23 ). The observed variations in anaplasmosis prevalence could be related to different factors, such as geographical areas, climatic conditions, different tick vectors, and the presence of reservoir hosts. Ripicephalus bursa and other ticks can transmit A. ovis to small ruminants. The high prevalence of A. ovis in eastern Turkey can be attributed to the domination of Hyaloma and Ripicephalus ticks in that region ( 23 ). In the present study, although the infection with A. ovis was not significantly different between the over- and under-one-year-old sheep and goats, with older animals showing a higher infection rate. Although infections with A. ovis usually occur in sheep and goats at all ages, adult animals are more likely to be infected, since they spend more time in the pasture for grazing and are more prone to be bitten by the tick vectors. Similarly, a study showed that the prevalence of A. ovis was 1.2 times higher in sheep over one year old than in sheep under that age ( 12 ). Furthermore, our study found no significant association between the prevalence of anaplasmosis and gender, species, and sampling location, consistent with the findings from other studies ( 12 , 24 ). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the sequence obtained in the present study (MH790273) had 100% homology with the sequence obtained from sheep infected with Anaplasma in Ahvaz province, Iran (JQ621903.1) ( 14 ) and was closely related to the sequences obtained from Mongolia, Sudan, China, Greece, Hungary, and Tunisia. However, our isolates were relatively different from isolates found in Sudan, Iran, Italy, and America. It also completely differed from the sequences obtained from Tunisia (KM285222.1) and Iran (EU925811.1) (Figure 3). Phylogenetic findings have revealed the genetic variations in different isolates, and the existence of these variations can be attributed to the differences in geographical areas, climate, tick vectors, intermediate hosts, and even the pathogenicity of A. ovis ( 24 ). In conclusion, the findings of this molecular study showed that A. phagocytophilum was not present in horses sampled from different regions of Ardabil province. In contrast, 7.05% of sheep and goats in East Azerbaijan province tested positive for A. ovis, highlighting the prevalence of this pathogen in this region. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a close relationship between the obtained A. ovis sequence and various global strains, demonstrating the worldwide distribution of this pathogen.

Acknowledgment

The authors express their gratitude to the Research Vice-Chancellor of the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran, for providing financial support.

Authors' Contribution

H. A.: Conceptualization, investigation, writing-original draft, and analysis

M. B.: Investigation, Mega 4 software for drawing the Phylogenetic tree, reviewing, and editing

A. I. B.: Investigation and analysis

Z. A.: Investigation and writing-original draft

Ethics

This study was approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee of the University of Tabriz, Iran (Approval ID: IR.TABRIZU.REC.1398.036, Approval date: 2020-03-01; Approval ID: IR.TABRIZU.REC.1399.038, Approval date: 2020-09-27).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

1. Bauer BU, Răileanu C, Tauchmann O, Fischer S, Ambros C, Silaghi C, et al. M. Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma ovis–Emerging Pathogens in the German Sheep Population. Pathogens. 2021; 10(10):1298.
2. Oliver A, Conrado FO, Nolen-Walston R. Equine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract. 2023; 39(1):133-45.
3. Schafer I, Silaghi C, Fischer S, Marsboom C, Hendrickx G, Gehlen H, et al. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses from Germany by molecular and serological testing (2008-2021). Vet Parasitol. 2022; 312:8.
4. Dzięgiel B, Adaszek Ł, Kalinowski M, Winiarczyk S. Equine granulocytic anaplasmosis. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95(2):316-20.
5. Stuen S, Longbottom D. Treatment and Control of Chlamydial and Rickettsial Infections in Sheep and Goats. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract. 2011; 27(1):213-33.
6. Stuen S. Haemoparasites in small ruminants in European countries: Challenges and clinical relevance. Small Rumin Res. 2016; 142:22-7.
7. Tumwebaze MA, Lee S-H, Adjou Moumouni PF, Mohammed-Geba K, Sheir SK, Galal-Khallaf A, et al. First detection of Anaplasma ovis in sheep and Anaplasma platys-like variants from cattle in Menoufia governorate, Egypt. Parasitol Int. 2020; 78:102150.
8. Noaman V, Bastani D. Molecular study on infection rates of Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale in sheep and cattle in West-Azerbaijan province, Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2016; 7(2):163-7.
9. Yan YQ, Lu CY, Gong PH, Pei ZY, Peng YS, Jian FC, et al. Molecular detection and phylogeny of Anaplasma spp. closely related to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in small ruminants from China. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2022; 13(5):12.
10. Noaman V. Factors associated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in sheep in Iran. Small Rumin Res. 2022; 208:106617.
11. Mohammadian B, Noaman V, Emami SJ. Molecular survey on prevalence and risk factors of Anaplasma spp. infection in cattle and sheep in West of Iran. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2021; 53(2):266.
12. Noaman V, Sazmand A. Anaplasma ovis infection in sheep from Iran: molecular prevalence, associated risk factors, and spatial clustering. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021; 54(1):6.
13. Noaman V. Epidemiological study on Anaplasma phagocytophilum in cattle: Molecular prevalence and risk factors assessment in different ecological zones in Iran. Prev Vet Med. 2020; 183:105118.
14. Jalali SM, Khaki Z, Kazemi B, Bandehpour M, Rahbari S, Razi Jalali M, Yasini SP. Molecular detection and identification of Anaplasma species in sheep from Ahvaz. Iran J Vet Res. 2013; 14(1):50-6.
15. Razzaq F, Khosa T, Ahmad S, Hussain M, Saeed Z, Khan MA, et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses from Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Trop Biomed. 2015; 32(2):233-9.
16. Alani A, Yousif A. Phylogenetic identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses in Baghdad, Iraq. Online J Anim Feed Res. 2023; 13(3)
17. Noaman V, Shayan P. Molecular detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in carrier cattle of Iran - first documented report. Iran J Microbiol. 2009; 1(2)
18. Noaman V, Beiranvand MH. Application of a nested polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma phagocytophilium in cattle in Lorestan province, Iran. J Hell Vet Med Soc. 2022; 73(3):4365-72.
19. Yousefi A, Rahbari S, Shayan P, Sadeghi-dehkordi Z, Bahonar A. Molecular evidence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum: an emerging tick-borne pathogen in domesticated small ruminant of Iran; first report. Comp Clin Path. 2017; 26(3):637-42.
20. Renneker S, Abdo J, Salih DEA, Karagenç T, Bilgiç H, Torina A, et al. Can Anaplasma ovis in Small Ruminants be Neglected any Longer?. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013; 60(s2):105-12.
21. Renneker S, Abdo J, Bakheit MA, Kullmann B, Beyer D, Ahmed J, Seitzer U. Coinfection of Sheep with Anaplasma, Theileria and Babesia Species in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013; 60(s2):113-8.
22. Al-Khalifa MS, Hussein HS, Diab FM, Khalil GM. Blood parasites of livestock in certain Regions in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2009; 16(2):63-7.
23. Altay KD, Nazir Aktaş, Münir Özüpek, Sezai. Survey of Anaplasma infections in small ruminants from East part of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014; 20(1):1-4.
24. Naeem M, Amaro-Estrada I, Taqadus A, Swelum AA, Alqhtani AH, Asif M, et al. Molecular prevalence and associated risk factors of Anaplasma ovis in Pakistani sheep. Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10
25. Ahmadi-Hamedani M, Khaki Z, Rahbari S, Kazemi B, Bandehpour M. Molecular identification of anaplasmosis in goats using a new PCR-RFLP method. Iran J Vet Res. 2009; 10(4):367-72.