Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences Similarity and Protein Prediction of Some Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Iraqi Patients with Urinary Tract Infections

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance leads to a dramatic increase in the morbidity and mortality caused by infectious diseases. Even though estimates vary widely, the economic cost of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria is on a rise. The current aimed to identify the antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli (E. coli). In fact, this study focused on the recent deep-learning methods (sequencing) to investigate E. coli antibiotic resistance and their protein sequences. To evaluate antibiotic resistance, the sequencing method could be considered the method of choice. The E. coli was identified by either specific biochemical tests or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the 16S rRNA gene. The results of aadA1 gene sequences demonstrated 10 nucleic acid substitutions throughout, as compared to the reference NCBI database (MG385063). Out of the 10 nucleic acid substitutions, 9 missense effects were observed. While the dfrA1 gene sequences illustrated 20 nucleic acid substitutions throughout, compared to the reference NCBI database (KY706080), out of the 20 nucleic acid substitutions, 8 missense effects were observed. Furthermore, the sul1 gene sequences displayed 20 nucleic acid substitutions throughout, in comparison with the reference NCBI database (CP069561), and out of the 20 nucleic acid substitutions, 12 missense effects were detected. The cat1 gene sequences showed 14 nucleic acid substitutions throughout, compared to the reference NCBI database (NC017660), and out of the 14 nucleic acid substitutions, 8 missense effects were observed. The precise point (Missense) mutation in four genes (aadA1, dfrA1, sul1, and cat1) in the expected sequence is interpreted to be the target site of a site-specific recombination mechanism that led to antibiotics resistance in E. coli isolates.

Keywords


  1. Boolchandani M, D’Souza AW, Dantas G. Sequencing-based methods and resources to study antimicrobial resistance. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(6):356-70.
  2. Wang R, van Dorp L, Shaw LP, Bradley P, Wang Q, Wang X, et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1-9.
  3. Deng Y, Bao X, Ji L, Chen L, Liu J, Miao J, et al. Resistance integrons: class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Ann clin microbiol. 2015;14(1):1-11.
  4. Jiang H, Cheng H, Liang Y, Yu S, Yu T, Fang J, et al. Diverse mobile genetic elements and conjugal transferability of sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, and sul3) in Escherichia coli isolates from Penaeus vannamei and pork from large markets in Zhejiang, China. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1787.
  5. Singh T, Das S, Ramachandran V, Wani S, Shah D, Maroof KA, et al. Distribution of integrons and phylogenetic groups among enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from children< 5 years of age in Delhi, India. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:561.
  6. Hutchison CA, Chuang R-Y, Noskov VN, Assad-Garcia N, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science. 2016;351(6280).
  7. Brooks GF, Butel J, Morse S, Jawetz M. Adelberg’s medical microbiology. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2007;7:273.
  8. Al-Shamari RK, Al-Khteeb SN. Molecular Characterization Aminoglycosids Resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iraqi J Sci. 2016;57(2B):1150-7.
  9. Mohammed RK, Abbas HN. Bactericidal effect of needle plasma system on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A: Sci. 2018;42(4):1725-33.
  10. Serio AW, Keepers T, Andrews L, Krause KM. Aminoglycoside revival: review of a historically important class of antimicrobials undergoing rejuvenation. EcoSal Plus. 2018;8(1).
  11. Prasada S, Bhat A, Bhat S, Mulki SS, Tulasidas S. Changing antibiotic susceptibility pattern in uropathogenic Escherichia coli over a period of 5 years in a tertiary care center. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1439.
  12. Chaves BJ, Tadi P. Gentamicin: StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2021.
  13. Reygaert WC. Antimicrobial mechanisms of Escherichia coli: London, UK: IntechOpen; 2017.
  14. Santhosh KS, Deekshit VK, Venugopal MN, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Multiple antimicrobial resistance and novel point mutation in fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Mangalore, India. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(8):994-1001.
  1. Logie C. Point Mutation: BoD–Books on Demand; 2012.
  2. Ibrahim AA. Identification of iha and kpsMT virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolates with urinary tract infection in Iraqi patients. Indian J Nat Sci. 2019;52(9):16675-82.
  3. Mohammed R. Molecular Identification of Geobacillus WCH 70 Isolate according to Nitrate reductase gene sequence. Al-Anbar J Vet Scie. 2016;9(2).
  4. Takahashi S, Kurimura Y, Hashimoto J, Uehara T, Hiyama Y, Tsukamoto T, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and penicillin-binding protein 1 and 2 mutations in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from male urethritis in Sapporo, Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19(1):50-6.
  5. Kumar H, Finer-Moore JS, Jiang X, Smirnova I, Kasho V, Pardon E, et al. Crystal structure of a ligand-bound LacY–nanobody complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(35):8769-74.
  1. Wijayasinghe YS. Molecular insights into N-acetylaspartate metabolism in canavan disease: The University of Toledo; 2014.
  2. Clark NC, Olsvik Ø, Swenson JM, Spiegel CA, Tenover FC. Detection of a streptomycin/spectinomycin adenylyltransferase gene (aadA) in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(1):157-60.
  3. Zhou Y, Fang J, Davood Z, Han J, Qu D. Fitness cost and compensation mechanism of sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, and sul3) in Escherichia coli. Environ Microbiol. 2021.

23.        Rossolini G, Arena F, Giani T. Mechanisms of Antibacterial Resistance. 2017. p. 1181-96.