Outbreak Investigation of Officially Reported and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N8 Subtype) in Iran During 2016

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Poultry Diseases, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Health and Management of Poultry Diseases, Iranian Veterinary Organization, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

On 14 November 2016, an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPA) was reported from a commercial layer farm located in Malard, Tehran Province, Iran. This study aimed to investigate the HPAI H5N8 outbreaks in Iran. The questionnaire was prepared and completed through interviews with farm owners or field observations at the time of disease onset from November 2016 to February 2017. The HPAI H5N8 infection was confirmed in 30 different locations including 10 villages (33.3%), nine-layer farms (33%), two broiler breeder farms (6.67%), one layer breeder farm (3.3%), one turkey farm (3.3%), one partridge farm (3.3%), five national parks (16.7%), and one wetland (3.3%) in 12 provinces of Iran. The cumulative incidence rates of disease in villages, layer farms, broiler breeder farms, layer breeder farms, partridge farms, and turkey farms were 0.02%, 0.87%, 0.55%, 6.25%, 7.14%, and 0.69%, respectively. The findings reflect that among the investigated variables at infected locations, new birds entering the home in villages, live bird markets, inappropriate biosecurity conditions, transporting manure during the breeding period, close proximity of a common road to infected farms, and poultry movement inside (pullet) and outside were the most frequently observed possible risk factors for these outbreaks. In conclusion, attention should be focused on the study of the dynamics and movements of domestic poultry, investigation and modification of the structure of industrial poultry farms, training for all related people, enhancement of passive surveillance, an increase in biosecurity, raising the awareness of the authorities on the importance of the infection, and provision of the required credits and facilities.

Keywords


Article Title [French]

Enquête sur la Flambée de Grippe Aviaire (Sous-Type H5N8) Officiellement Signalée et Hautement Pathogène en Iran en 2016

Abstract [French]

Le 14 novembre 2016, une flambée de grippe aviaire hautement pathogène (HPA) a été signalée dans une ferme d'élevage commerciale située à Malard, dans la province de Téhéran, en Iran. Cette étude visait à enquêter sur les flambées de grippe aviaire H5N8 en Iran. Le questionnaire a été préparé et complété par le biais d'entretiens avec les propriétaires de fermes ou d'observations sur le terrain au moment de l'apparition de la maladie de novembre 2016 à février 2017. L'infection HPAI H5N8 a été confirmée dans 30 sites différents, dont 10 villages (33,3%), neuf ferme de pondeuses (33%), deux fermes d'élevage de poulets de chair (6,67%), une ferme d'élevage de poulets de chair (3,3%), une ferme de dinde (3,3%), une ferme de perdrix (3,3%), cinq parcs nationaux (16,7%) et une zone humide (3,3%) dans 12 provinces d'Iran. Taux d'incidence cumulée de la maladie dans les villages, les fermes de ponte, les fermes d'élevage de poulets de chair, les fermes d'élevage de pondeuses, les fermes de perdrix et les fermes de dinde étaient respectivement de 0.02%, 0.87%, 0.55%, 6.25%, 7.14% et 0.69%. Les résultats montrent que parmi les variables étudiées dans les sites infectés, les nouveaux oiseaux entrant dans la maison dans les villages, les marchés d'oiseaux vivants, les conditions de biosécurité inappropriées, le transport du fumier pendant la période de reproduction, la proximité d'une route commune menant aux fermes infectées et le mouvement des volailles à l'intérieur (poulette) et à l'extérieur ont été les facteurs de risque possibles les plus fréquemment observés pour ces flambées. En conclusion, il convient de se concentrer sur l'étude de la dynamique et des mouvements des volailles domestiques, l'investigation et la modification de la structure des élevages industriels de volailles, la formation pour tous personnes apparentées, renforcement de la surveillance passive, augmentation de la biosécurité, sensibilisation des autorités à l'importance de l'infection et fourniture des crédits et des installations nécessaires.

Keywords [French]

  • HPAI H5N8
  • Iran
  • enquête sur l'épidémie
Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Mohammadnia Afruzi, S., Taghani, R.A., Saadat Akhtar, A., 2014. Review the ptoduction process of protein products in the country in four decades (1974 to2013). Center for Information and Communication Technology, Tehran.
Bertran, K., Lee, D.-H., Balzli, C., Pantin-Jackwood, M.J., Spackman, E., Swayne, D.E., 2016. Age is not a determinant factor in susceptibility of broilers to H5N2 clade 2.3.4.4 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus. Vet Res 47, 116.
BirdLife International, 2017. Country profile: Iran, Islamic Republic of. Available from http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country/iran. Checked: 2017-12-19
Capua, I., Marangon, S., 2000. The avian influenza epidemic in Italy, 1999—2000: A review. Avian Pathol 29, 289-294.
Ebadzadeh, H.R., Ahmadi, K., Mohammadnia Afruzi, S., Taghani, R.A., Abbasi, M., Yari, S., 2017. Agriculcural statistics. Tehran.
Ebadzadeh, H.R., Ahmadi, K., Mohammadnia Afruzi, S., Taghani, R.A., Moradi Eslami, A., Yari, S.M.A., 2015. Agricultural statistics. Center for Information and Communication Technology, Tehran, pp. 99-160.
EC, 2006. COMMISSION DECISION. of 14 June 2006. Concerning certain transitional measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry or other captive birds in the Community. Off J Eur Union 164.
EC, 2010. Commission decision 2011/367/EU of 25 June 2010 on the implementation by member states of surveillance programs for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds. Off J Eur Union L 166, 7. (accessed 01.07.10.).
Fallah Mehrabadi, M.H., Bahonar, A.R., Vasfi Marandi, M., Sadrzadeh, A., Tehrani, F., Salman, M.D., 2016. Sero-survey of Avian Influenza in backyard poultry and wild bird species in Iran-2014. Prev Vet Med 128, 1–5.
FAO, 2016. H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of clade 2.3.4.4 detected through surveillance of wild migratory birds in the Tyva Republic, the Russian Federation – potential for international spread.Rome:  [Accessed 11 Nov 2016]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6113e.pdf. EMPRES Watch 35.
FAO, 2017. H5N8 HPAI GLOBAL situation update.11 October 2017, 18:00 hours. Rome.
Farsad, A.S., Malekzadeh-Shafaroudi, S., Moshtaghi, N., Fotouhi, F., Zibaee, S., 2016. Expression of HA1 antigen of H5N1 influenza virus as a potent candidate for vaccine in bacterial system. Iran J Vet Res 17, 237-242.
Ghafouri, S.A., GhalyanchiLangeroudi, A., Maghsoudloo, H., Kh Farahani, R., Abdollahi, H., Tehrani, F., et al., 2017. Clade 2.3.4.4 avian influenza A (H5N8) outbreak in commercial poultry, Iran, 2016: the first report and update data. Trop Anim Health Pro 49, 1089-1093.
Hosseinpour, R., Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Mohammadnia Afruzi, S., Taghani, R.A., 2014. Export and import of agricultural sector. Center for Information and Communication Technology, Tehran.
Kung, N.Y., Morris, R.S., Perkins, N.R., Sims, L.D., Ellis, T.M., Bissett, L., et al., 2007. Risk for infection with highly pathogenic influenza A virus (H5N1) in chickens, Hong Kong, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis 13, 412-418.
Mannelli, A., Ferre, N., Marangon, S., 2006. Analysis of the 1999-2000 highly pathogenic avian influenza (H7N1) epidemic in the main poultry-production area in northern Italy. Prev Vet Med 73, 273-285.
McQuiston, J.H., Garber, L.P., Porter-Spalding, B.A., Hahn, J.W., Pierson, F.W., Wainwright, S.H., et al., 2005. Evaluation of risk factors for the spread of low pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza virus among commercial poultry farms. J Am Vet Med Assoc 226, 767-772.
Monne, I., Ormelli, S., Salviato, A., De Battisti, C., Bettini, F., Salomoni, A., et al., 2008. Development and Validation of a One-Step Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Subtype H5, H7, and H9 Avian Influenza Viruses. J Clin Microbiol 46, 1769-1773.
Nourani, E., Kaboli, M., Collen, B.E.N., 2014. An assessment of threats to Anatidae in Iran. Bird Conserv Int 25, 242-257.
OIE, 2017a. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals.Chapter 2.3.14. Newcastle disease (infection with Newcastle disease virus) (NB: Version adopted in May 2012).
OIE, 2017b. Update on highly pathogenic avian influenza in animals (type H5 and H7) [Internet]. Avialable at:http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/temp/reports/en_fup_0000023659_20170505_133144.pdf.
Pavade, G., Awada, L., Hamilton, K., Swayne, D.E., 2011. The influence of economic indicators, poultry density and the performance of veterinary services on the control of high-pathogenicity avian influenza in poultry. Rev Sci Tech 30, 661-671.
Swayne, John R., G., Larry R., M., Lisa K., N., David L., S., Venugopal, N., 2013. Diseases of Poultry, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Iowa 50010, USA.
Thanawat, T., Prasit, C., Thaweesak, S., Arunee, C., Wirongrong, H., Chantanee, B., et al., 2005. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1, Thailand, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis J 11, 1664-1672.
Thomas, M.E., Bouma, A., Ekker, H.M., Fonken, A.J., Stegeman, J.A., Nielen, M., 2005. Risk factors for the
introduction of high pathogenicity Avian Influenza virus into poultry farms during the epidemic in the Netherlands in 2003. Prev Vet Med 69, 1-11.